mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
Date Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:50:56 GMT
Hi all,

Release status:

Currently, for release 1.3.0 there are a couple of issues open which needs
to be resolved before cutting RC.

The current date we are looking at for cutting RC0 is 08/17(Friday).



Open issues which need to be looked at before cutting RC:

   1. Topk regression issue
   <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12197> - #12202 PR
   with fix <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12202>
   2. Excessive memory allocation issue
   <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116> - #12184 PR
   with fix <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12184>
   3. Test_io.test_csvIter breaks on CentOS
   <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12139> - #12189 PR
   with fix  <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12189>



@committers, could you please help review these PRs and get them merged?



Thanks,

Roshani

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Talked to the person who ran resnet50 benchmarks offline. Build flag was
> not properly set so there was a difference in performance numbers observed.
> There is no issue caught and he was able to get the same results as
> mentioned here https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html
> <https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results>
>
> We are good here.
>
> Thanks,
> Roshani
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:08 PM Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dom,
>>
>> I verified resnet50 run on MXNet master branch. Checked on single gpu
>> machine. Numbers match. I didn't see any performance degradation.
>> https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html#scoring-results
>>
>> Can you please give me more details on the instance type and script you
>> ran exactly so that I can try to reproduce it again?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roshani
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:31 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is not a major feature. I meant other new feature requests PR won't
>>> be accepted in 1.3 release now.
>>> Bug fixes will be accepted. I will be trying to reproduce the regression
>>> Dom mentioned today. :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Roshani
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:06 PM Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this is a major feature? This is a regression that Dom is reporting
>>>> wrt
>>>> to performance
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Roshani Nagmote <
>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Thanks for reporting this issue Dom.
>>>> > 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze date. We won't be
>>>> accepting any
>>>> > new features now for MXNet 1.3 release.
>>>> > RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday).
>>>> >
>>>> > Will be verifying the performance degradation issue mentioned.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Roshani
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni, Dominic
>>>> > <ddivakar@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from master branch on
>>>> Friday
>>>> > and
>>>> > > were seeing degraded performance on GPU - about 50% slower compared
>>>> to
>>>> > > these values here https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html.
>>>> FWIW
>>>> > > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well as the TRT integrated
>>>> > MXNet.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Something for you all to verify before or after you cut the RC.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thx!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" <
>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >     Hey Roshani,
>>>> > >
>>>> > >     Has a RC branch already been cut?  If so, a quick heads up that
>>>> I
>>>> > think
>>>> > >     this commit should probably get into RC0 for 1.3.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>>> > ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3
>>>> > >
>>>> > >     It won't cause issues for users, but from a versioning
>>>> compatibility
>>>> > >     perspective it's probably better that we remove these functions
>>>> in
>>>> > this
>>>> > >     release. This way we don't have to worry about major bumps in
>>>> the
>>>> > next
>>>> > >     release if they're removed.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >     -Kellen
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >     On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>>>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >     > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for working to get TensorRT PR
>>>> > > merged!
>>>> > >     > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that issue and fixes to get
>>>> in
>>>> > the
>>>> > >     > release.
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > >     > We are starting code freeze for 1.3 release today. A release
>>>> > > candidate will
>>>> > >     > be cut on 08/17.
>>>> > >     > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions.
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > >     > Thanks,
>>>> > >     > Roshani
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > >     > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen sunderland <
>>>> > >     > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > >     > > All merged and ready to go from my side Roshani (the
>>>> TensorRT
>>>> > PR).
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116 looks it's a blocker.
>>>> I'll
>>>> > try
>>>> > > and
>>>> > >     > > reproduce it locally to get another datapoint.
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina <
>>>> > sina.beh@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > wrote:
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is a release
>>>> > blocker:
>>>> > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116
>>>> - Sina
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nagmote" <
>>>> > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     Thanks, Kellen for letting me know.
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen sunderland <
>>>> > >     > > >     kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready by Friday.
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >     > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani Nagmote <
>>>> > >     > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > >     > wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were treating this PR as a
>>>> > release
>>>> > >     > > blocker.
>>>> > >     > > > Do you
>>>> > >     > > >     > > have any ETA by which it will be completed?
>>>> Approximate
>>>> > > time
>>>> > >     > will
>>>> > >     > > > also
>>>> > >     > > >     > > work.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing this PR into notice. I
>>>> will
>>>> > > keep a
>>>> > >     > > track
>>>> > >     > > > of it.
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > -Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM Joshua Z. Zhang <
>>>> > >     > > > cheungchih@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > I strongly suggest to track this PR
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
>>>> > <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
>>>> > >
>>>> > > in 1.3
>>>> > >     > > > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > which fixed the usability issue for lower end
>>>> > machines
>>>> > > that
>>>> > >     > > > don’t have
>>>> > >     > > >     > as
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > large shared memory space as ec2 instances.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > Best,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > - Zhi
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Roshani Nagmote <
>>>> > >     > > >     > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Hi all,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet 1.3 release
>>>> for
>>>> > > pending
>>>> > >     > > > TensorRT PR
>>>> > >     > > >     > (
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > https://github.com/apache/
>>>> > incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>>>> > > ).
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > I wanted to ask everyone for their opinions
>>>> if we
>>>> > > should
>>>> > >     > > delay
>>>> > >     > > > the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > to get tensorRT integration in or we should go
>>>> > ahead
>>>> > > with
>>>> > >     > the
>>>> > >     > > > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > include tensorRT in next release. Please
>>>> provide
>>>> > >     > suggestions.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:45 AM Hagay Lupesko
>>>> <
>>>> > >     > > > lupesko@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Some thoughts: why not keep it out of 1.3,
>>>> and
>>>> > > merge it
>>>> > >     > into
>>>> > >     > > > master
>>>> > >     > > >     > so
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > it
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> can go out with 1.4 instead?
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Pros:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Reduce quality risks for 1.3
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - More time to test and get feedback before
>>>> > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - Avoid further delays in 1.3 release (lots
>>>> of
>>>> > good
>>>> > > stuff
>>>> > >     > > > there
>>>> > >     > > >     > > already
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > for
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> users)
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Cons:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> - People will need to get master to
>>>> experiment
>>>> > with
>>>> > > TRT
>>>> > >     > (not
>>>> > >     > > > a major
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > issue
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> IMO)
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a build flag anyway, so
>>>> > MXNet
>>>> > > users
>>>> > >     > > > consuming
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > built
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala) will anyway not be
>>>> able to
>>>> > > try it
>>>> > >     > out
>>>> > >     > > > unless
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> building from source...
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> Thoughts?
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:38 PM Steffen
>>>> Rochel <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > steffenrochel@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun, Da, Eric, myself and a
>>>> few
>>>> > > other
>>>> > >     > people
>>>> > >     > > >     > discussed
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> offline about TensorRT integration PR (
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 ).
>>>> > >     > We
>>>> > >     > > > do
>>>> > >     > > >     > agree
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > that
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> it
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> would be good to include the PR into
>>>> upcoming 1.3
>>>> > >     > release,
>>>> > >     > > > but are
>>>> > >     > > >     > > all
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> concerned about the risk involved and the
>>>> > breaking
>>>> > > API
>>>> > >     > > > change. The
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> discussion converged to following proposal.
>>>> (1)
>>>> > > change to
>>>> > >     > > > contrib
>>>> > >     > > >     > PR
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> (2) define a different top level API to
>>>> indicate
>>>> > > that the
>>>> > >     > > > package
>>>> > >     > > >     > is
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > part
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> of contrib and experimental (details of API
>>>> TBD
>>>> > > between
>>>> > >     > > > Marek,
>>>> > >     > > >     > Kellen
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Eric). This change would allow to include
>>>> TRT
>>>> > > integration
>>>> > >     > > > with v1.3
>>>> > >     > > >     > > to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> enable users to try TRT with MXNet,
>>>> minimize the
>>>> > > risk and
>>>> > >     > > > avoid
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > breaking
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> API change.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> To accommodate the change the request is to
>>>> delay
>>>> > > RC for
>>>> > >     > a
>>>> > >     > > > few
>>>> > >     > > >     > days.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Regards,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Steffen
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM Roshani
>>>> Nagmote <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Hi,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I have created a wiki for tracking MXNet
>>>> 1.3
>>>> > > release
>>>> > >     > with
>>>> > >     > > > the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > timeline.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Please take a look here:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>>> > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> I am still waiting for following 2 PRs to
>>>> get
>>>> > > merged:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> TRT integration:
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Gluon RNN:
>>>> > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).*
>>>> Kindly
>>>> > try
>>>> > > to
>>>> > >     > > > complete
>>>> > >     > > >     > > ongoing
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> work
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and get these PRs merged.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani
>>>> Nagmote
>>>> > <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Hi all,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Here is an update on MXNet 1.3 release:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I am still waiting for following PRs to
>>>> get
>>>> > > merged:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> TRT integration:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN:
>>>> > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Scala examples:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> *New code freeze date is: 08/03*  Please
>>>> try to
>>>> > > get
>>>> > >     > your
>>>> > >     > > > ongoing
>>>> > >     > > >     > > PRs
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> merged by then.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't include your PRs in
>>>> tracking
>>>> > > list as
>>>> > >     > you
>>>> > >     > > > said
>>>> > >     > > >     > > those
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> are
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> not critical for now. Please let me know
>>>> if
>>>> > > those needs
>>>> > >     > > to
>>>> > >     > > > be
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> included.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I also have updated project proposal
>>>> cwiki page
>>>> > > to
>>>> > >     > update
>>>> > >     > > > the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > status
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> PRs.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Please let me know if I am missing
>>>> something.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM Pedro
>>>> Larroy <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> I would like to get these PR merged:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> How much longer until the code freeze?
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44 AM Roshani
>>>> > Nagmote
>>>> > > <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be merged for 1.3
>>>> release:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Are there any other PRs waiting to get
>>>> > merged?
>>>> > > Please
>>>> > >     > > > let me
>>>> > >     > > >     > > know.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Release blocker issue:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for bringing up
>>>> the
>>>> > > important
>>>> > >     > > > topic. I
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> agree
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> with
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> you and we(internal Amazon team) will be
>>>> > > working on
>>>> > >     > > > fixing the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> disabled
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> tests.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Currently, my colleague, Hao Jin is
>>>> working
>>>> > on
>>>> > >     > > compiling
>>>> > >     > > > the
>>>> > >     > > >     > list
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> of
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> disabled tests and leading the effort
>>>> to fix
>>>> > > them in
>>>> > >     > > the
>>>> > >     > > > next
>>>> > >     > > >     > few
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> days.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM kellen
>>>> > > sunderland <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks again for organizing Roshani.  I
>>>> > > believe the
>>>> > >     > > > TensorRT
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> work
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> is
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> ready
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> for a merge.  Thanks to Marek and all
>>>> the
>>>> > > NVIDIA
>>>> > >     > > people
>>>> > >     > > > for
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> iterating
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> on
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> it.  If possible could a committer
>>>> review,
>>>> > > make sure
>>>> > >     > > it
>>>> > >     > > > meets
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> their
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> expectations and then merge?  PR is
>>>> here:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> To Marco's point.  I'd recommend we
>>>> review
>>>> > > some of
>>>> > >     > > those
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> disabled
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> tests
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> see how likely they are to affect users
>>>> > > before we
>>>> > >     > cut
>>>> > >     > > a
>>>> > >     > > >     > release.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> Many of
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> them are obviously not too important
>>>> from a
>>>> > > user's
>>>> > >     > > > point of
>>>> > >     > > >     > view
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> (e.g.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> downloading a sometimes-offline image
>>>> in a
>>>> > > test).
>>>> > >     > One
>>>> > >     > > > idea
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> would
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> be
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> try
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> and address as many of the customer
>>>> > impacting
>>>> > > issues
>>>> > >     > > as
>>>> > >     > > >     > possible
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> between
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> code freeze and the RC0 vote.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:23 PM Marco
>>>> de
>>>> > Abreu
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> <marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com.invalid>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Roshani,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> frequent releases are good and I'm
>>>> > > supportive for
>>>> > >     > > this
>>>> > >     > > > in
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> general
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> in
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> order
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> to provide our users with the latest
>>>> > > features and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> improvements.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> But
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> at
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> moment, I'm slightly concerned about
>>>> the
>>>> > test
>>>> > >     > > coverage
>>>> > >     > > > due to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> [1]. I
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> want
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> us to be conscious about cutting a
>>>> release
>>>> > > even
>>>> > >     > > though
>>>> > >     > > > not
>>>> > >     > > >     > all
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> tests
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> are
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> enabled (29 disabled tests [2] as of
>>>> > today).
>>>> > >     > > However, I
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> acknowledge
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> that
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> we
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> have improved by a lot lately thanks
>>>> to
>>>> > > everybody
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> participating
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> leading
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the efforts around improving flaky
>>>> tests.
>>>> > > From a
>>>> > >     > > >     > retrospective
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> point of
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> view, we could say that these efforts
>>>> have
>>>> > > actually
>>>> > >     > > > revealed
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> some
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> quite
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> interesting bugs and thus the time
>>>> was well
>>>> > > spent
>>>> > >     > and
>>>> > >     > > > yielded
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> good
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> results.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> What does the community think about
>>>> making
>>>> > > another
>>>> > >     > > > sprint of
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> improvements
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> around tests followed up by a period
>>>> of 1-2
>>>> > > weeks
>>>> > >     > > > during
>>>> > >     > > >     > which
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> we
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> observe
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the failures closely to ensure that no
>>>> > > critical
>>>> > >     > paths
>>>> > >     > > > are
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> impacted?
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> If
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> we
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> are in a good shape by then, we could
>>>> > > continue the
>>>> > >     > > > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> process
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> at
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the same time have the advantage of
>>>> giving
>>>> > >     > > > contributors more
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> lead
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> time
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> finish their work to ensure it gets
>>>> into
>>>> > the
>>>> > >     > release
>>>> > >     > > > in the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> desired
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> quality.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to everybody for their
>>>> > efforts
>>>> > > during
>>>> > >     > > > the last
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> weeks
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> improve the usability and stability of
>>>> > > MXNet. This
>>>> > >     > is
>>>> > >     > > > great
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> community
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> effort and a good example of a
>>>> community
>>>> > > working
>>>> > >     > > > together
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> towards
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> a
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> unified
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> goal!
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Marco
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd0b0
>>>> > 74b01f46564194ea89b86c6a3e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [2]:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%
>>>> > 3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Disabled+test%22
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 PM
>>>> Roshani
>>>> > > Nagmote <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> As mentioned before, code freeze
>>>> date is
>>>> > > today
>>>> > >     > July
>>>> > >     > > > 23rd.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Please
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> try
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> get
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> your ongoing PRs merged by today.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any
>>>> > > concerns or
>>>> > >     > need
>>>> > >     > > > more
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> time.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM
>>>> Anirudh
>>>> > > Acharya <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> anirudhkrec@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> @sandeep krishnamurthy <
>>>> > >     > > sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com>
>>>> > >     > > > the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> bug
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> fixes
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> in
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> R-package is something we have just
>>>> > begun,
>>>> > > there
>>>> > >     > > > will not
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> be
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> anything
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> significant to announce before the
>>>> v1.3
>>>> > > code
>>>> > >     > > freeze.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM
>>>> Steffen
>>>> > > Rochel <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> steffenrochel@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it easier to find the
>>>> > discussions
>>>> > >     > related
>>>> > >     > > to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> project
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> proposals
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> I
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> added a column with a link to the
>>>> thread
>>>> > > on dev@
>>>> > >     > > > for
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> most
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> projects.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate for the project owners
>>>> to
>>>> > fill
>>>> > > in the
>>>> > >     > > > blanks
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> check
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that I
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> got the right threads.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steffen
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11 PM
>>>> Roshani
>>>> > > Nagmote
>>>> > >     > <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kellen,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I will update the notes
>>>> with the
>>>> > >     > > information.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM
>>>> kellen
>>>> > >     > > sunderland <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Roshani,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to add
>>>> 'TensorRT
>>>> > > Runtime
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> Integration'
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> list
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upcoming features?  We'll target
>>>> > > getting the
>>>> > >     > > > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> in
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> polished
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23rd.  Design proposal is here:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>>> > Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the lead contributor is Marek
>>>> > > Kolodziej.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Kellen
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 PM
>>>> > Roshani
>>>> > >     > Nagmote
>>>> > >     > > <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting the process to
>>>> prepare
>>>> > > for
>>>> > >     > Apache
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> MXNet
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> (incubating)
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release. Please find project
>>>> proposal
>>>> > > draft
>>>> > >     > for
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >> this
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <*
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>>> > Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Target feature freeze date is
>>>> July
>>>> > > 23rd. A
>>>> > >     > > > release
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> candidate
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> will
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around Monday, August 6th and
>>>> voting
>>>> > > will
>>>> > >     > > > commence
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>> from
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> then
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> until
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, August 9th. If you
>>>> have any
>>>> > >     > > additional
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> features
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> in
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> progress
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to include it in this
>>>> > > release,
>>>> > >     > > please
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>> make
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> sure
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> comment
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can update the release notes.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to add any other
>>>> > >     > > comments/suggestions.
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > > >>
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >     > >
>>>> > >     > > >     >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > > >
>>>> > >     > >
>>>> > >     >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message