mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release plan - MXNET 1.3
Date Mon, 13 Aug 2018 19:05:14 GMT
Is this is a major feature? This is a regression that Dom is reporting wrt
to performance

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Thanks for reporting this issue Dom.
> 08/10 (Frida)y was the major feature freeze date. We won't be accepting any
> new features now for MXNet 1.3 release.
> RC0 will be cut on 08/17(Friday).
>
> Will be verifying the performance degradation issue mentioned.
>
> Thanks,
> Roshani
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:45 AM Divakaruni, Dominic
> <ddivakar@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Hi all, We tested resnet50 on MXNet built from master branch on Friday
> and
> > were seeing degraded performance on GPU - about 50% slower compared to
> > these values here https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/faq/perf.html. FWIW
> > this slowdown was seen for both MXNet as well as the TRT integrated
> MXNet.
> >
> > Something for you all to verify before or after you cut the RC.
> >
> > Thx!
> >
> > On 8/13/18, 4:34 AM, "kellen sunderland" <kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Hey Roshani,
> >
> >     Has a RC branch already been cut?  If so, a quick heads up that I
> think
> >     this commit should probably get into RC0 for 1.3.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> ee8755a2531b322fec29c9c3d2aa3b8738da41f3
> >
> >     It won't cause issues for users, but from a versioning compatibility
> >     perspective it's probably better that we remove these functions in
> this
> >     release. This way we don't have to worry about major bumps in the
> next
> >     release if they're removed.
> >
> >     -Kellen
> >
> >
> >     On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:24 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> >     wrote:
> >
> >     > Thanks Kellen and everyone else for working to get TensorRT PR
> > merged!
> >     > @Sina, I will be keeping track of that issue and fixes to get in
> the
> >     > release.
> >     >
> >     > We are starting code freeze for 1.3 release today. A release
> > candidate will
> >     > be cut on 08/17.
> >     > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions.
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > Roshani
> >     >
> >     > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:39 AM kellen sunderland <
> >     > kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     >
> >     > > All merged and ready to go from my side Roshani (the TensorRT
> PR).
> >     > >
> >     > > I agree with Sina that issue 12116 looks it's a blocker.  I'll
> try
> > and
> >     > > reproduce it locally to get another datapoint.
> >     > >
> >     > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:15 AM Afrooze, Sina <
> sina.beh@gmail.com>
> >     > wrote:
> >     > >
> >     > > > Hi Roshani - I think this regression issue is a release
> blocker:
> >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/12116  - Sina
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > On 8/8/18, 12:40 PM, "Roshani Nagmote" <
> > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> >     > > wrote:
> >     > > >
> >     > > >     Thanks, Kellen for letting me know.
> >     > > >
> >     > > >     On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:09 PM kellen sunderland <
> >     > > >     kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > > >
> >     > > >     > Hey Roshani, I think it should be ready by Friday.
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >     > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 10:20 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> >     > > > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> >     > > >     > wrote:
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >     > > Thanks Kellen. Yes, we were treating this PR as a
> release
> >     > > blocker.
> >     > > > Do you
> >     > > >     > > have any ETA by which it will be completed? Approximate
> > time
> >     > will
> >     > > > also
> >     > > >     > > work.
> >     > > >     > > @zhi, Thanks for bringing this PR into notice. I will
> > keep a
> >     > > track
> >     > > > of it.
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     > > -Roshani
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:30 AM Joshua Z. Zhang <
> >     > > > cheungchih@gmail.com>
> >     > > >     > > wrote:
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     > > > I strongly suggest to track this PR
> >     > > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
> <
> >     > > >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11908
> >
> > in 1.3
> >     > > > release
> >     > > >     > > > which fixed the usability issue for lower end
> machines
> > that
> >     > > > don’t have
> >     > > >     > as
> >     > > >     > > > large shared memory space as ec2 instances.
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > > > Best,
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > > > - Zhi
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > > > > On Aug 7, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Roshani Nagmote <
> >     > > >     > roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > > > wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > > Hi all,
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > > Right now, we are delaying MXNet 1.3 release for
> > pending
> >     > > > TensorRT PR
> >     > > >     > (
> >     > > >     > > > > https://github.com/apache/
> incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> > ).
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > > I wanted to ask everyone for their opinions if we
> > should
> >     > > delay
> >     > > > the
> >     > > >     > > > release
> >     > > >     > > > > to get tensorRT integration in or we should go
> ahead
> > with
> >     > the
> >     > > > release
> >     > > >     > > and
> >     > > >     > > > > include tensorRT in next release. Please provide
> >     > suggestions.
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > > Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > > Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:45 AM Hagay Lupesko <
> >     > > > lupesko@gmail.com>
> >     > > >     > > wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > >> Some thoughts: why not keep it out of 1.3, and
> > merge it
> >     > into
> >     > > > master
> >     > > >     > so
> >     > > >     > > > it
> >     > > >     > > > >> can go out with 1.4 instead?
> >     > > >     > > > >> Pros:
> >     > > >     > > > >> - Reduce quality risks for 1.3
> >     > > >     > > > >> - More time to test and get feedback before
> release
> >     > > >     > > > >> - Avoid further delays in 1.3 release (lots of
> good
> > stuff
> >     > > > there
> >     > > >     > > already
> >     > > >     > > > for
> >     > > >     > > > >> users)
> >     > > >     > > > >> Cons:
> >     > > >     > > > >> - People will need to get master to experiment
> with
> > TRT
> >     > (not
> >     > > > a major
> >     > > >     > > > issue
> >     > > >     > > > >> IMO)
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > > >> Besides, TRT requires a build flag anyway, so
> MXNet
> > users
> >     > > > consuming
> >     > > >     > > > built
> >     > > >     > > > >> packages (PyPi, Scala) will anyway not be able to
> > try it
> >     > out
> >     > > > unless
> >     > > >     > > > >> building from source...
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > > >> Thoughts?
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 10:38 PM Steffen Rochel <
> >     > > >     > > steffenrochel@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >
> >     > > >     > > > >> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > > >>> Marek, Kellen, Jun, Da, Eric, myself and a few
> > other
> >     > people
> >     > > >     > discussed
> >     > > >     > > > >>> offline about TensorRT integration PR (
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 ).
> >     > We
> >     > > > do
> >     > > >     > agree
> >     > > >     > > > that
> >     > > >     > > > >>> it
> >     > > >     > > > >>> would be good to include the PR into upcoming 1.3
> >     > release,
> >     > > > but are
> >     > > >     > > all
> >     > > >     > > > >>> concerned about the risk involved and the
> breaking
> > API
> >     > > > change. The
> >     > > >     > > > >>> discussion converged to following proposal. (1)
> > change to
> >     > > > contrib
> >     > > >     > PR
> >     > > >     > > > and
> >     > > >     > > > >>> (2) define a different top level API to indicate
> > that the
> >     > > > package
> >     > > >     > is
> >     > > >     > > > part
> >     > > >     > > > >>> of contrib and experimental (details of API TBD
> > between
> >     > > > Marek,
> >     > > >     > Kellen
> >     > > >     > > > and
> >     > > >     > > > >>> Eric). This change would allow to include TRT
> > integration
> >     > > > with v1.3
> >     > > >     > > to
> >     > > >     > > > >>> enable users to try TRT with MXNet, minimize the
> > risk and
> >     > > > avoid
> >     > > >     > > > breaking
> >     > > >     > > > >>> API change.
> >     > > >     > > > >>> To accommodate the change the request is to delay
> > RC for
> >     > a
> >     > > > few
> >     > > >     > days.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>> Regards,
> >     > > >     > > > >>> Steffen
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:08 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> >     > > >     > > > >> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> Hi,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> I have created a wiki for tracking MXNet 1.3
> > release
> >     > with
> >     > > > the
> >     > > >     > > > timeline.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> Please take a look here:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> I am still waiting for following 2 PRs to get
> > merged:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> TRT integration:
> >     > > >     > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> Gluon RNN:
> >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).* Kindly
> try
> > to
> >     > > > complete
> >     > > >     > > ongoing
> >     > > >     > > > >>> work
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> and get these PRs merged.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani Nagmote
> <
> >     > > >     > > > >>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Hi all,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Here is an update on MXNet 1.3 release:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I am still waiting for following PRs to get
> > merged:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> TRT integration:
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Gluon RNN:
> >     > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Scala examples:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> *New code freeze date is: 08/03*  Please try to
> > get
> >     > your
> >     > > > ongoing
> >     > > >     > > PRs
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> merged by then.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> @Pedro, I didn't include your PRs in tracking
> > list as
> >     > you
> >     > > > said
> >     > > >     > > those
> >     > > >     > > > >>> are
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> not critical for now. Please let me know if
> > those needs
> >     > > to
> >     > > > be
> >     > > >     > > > >> included.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> I also have updated project proposal cwiki page
> > to
> >     > update
> >     > > > the
> >     > > >     > > status
> >     > > >     > > > >> of
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> PRs.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Please let me know if I am missing something.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM Pedro Larroy <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> I would like to get these PR merged:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> How much longer until the code freeze?
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44 AM Roshani
> Nagmote
> > <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Hi all,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> PRs waiting to be merged for 1.3 release:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Are there any other PRs waiting to get
> merged?
> > Please
> >     > > > let me
> >     > > >     > > know.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Release blocker issue:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for bringing up the
> > important
> >     > > > topic. I
> >     > > >     > > > >> agree
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> with
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> you and we(internal Amazon team) will be
> > working on
> >     > > > fixing the
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> disabled
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> tests.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Currently, my colleague, Hao Jin is working
> on
> >     > > compiling
> >     > > > the
> >     > > >     > list
> >     > > >     > > > >> of
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> disabled tests and leading the effort to fix
> > them in
> >     > > the
> >     > > > next
> >     > > >     > few
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> days.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM kellen
> > sunderland <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks again for organizing Roshani.  I
> > believe the
> >     > > > TensorRT
> >     > > >     > > > >> work
> >     > > >     > > > >>> is
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> ready
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> for a merge.  Thanks to Marek and all the
> > NVIDIA
> >     > > people
> >     > > > for
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> iterating
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> on
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> it.  If possible could a committer review,
> > make sure
> >     > > it
> >     > > > meets
> >     > > >     > > > >>> their
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> expectations and then merge?  PR is here:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> To Marco's point.  I'd recommend we review
> > some of
> >     > > those
> >     > > >     > > > >> disabled
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> tests
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> and
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> see how likely they are to affect users
> > before we
> >     > cut
> >     > > a
> >     > > >     > release.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> Many of
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> them are obviously not too important from a
> > user's
> >     > > > point of
> >     > > >     > view
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> (e.g.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> downloading a sometimes-offline image in a
> > test).
> >     > One
> >     > > > idea
> >     > > >     > > > >> would
> >     > > >     > > > >>> be
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> try
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> and address as many of the customer
> impacting
> > issues
> >     > > as
> >     > > >     > possible
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> between
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> code freeze and the RC0 vote.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:23 PM Marco de
> Abreu
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> <marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello Roshani,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> frequent releases are good and I'm
> > supportive for
> >     > > this
> >     > > > in
> >     > > >     > > > >>> general
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> in
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> order
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> to provide our users with the latest
> > features and
> >     > > >     > > > >> improvements.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> But
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> at
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> the
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> moment, I'm slightly concerned about the
> test
> >     > > coverage
> >     > > > due to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> [1]. I
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> want
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> us to be conscious about cutting a release
> > even
> >     > > though
> >     > > > not
> >     > > >     > all
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> tests
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> are
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> enabled (29 disabled tests [2] as of
> today).
> >     > > However, I
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> acknowledge
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> that
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> we
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> have improved by a lot lately thanks to
> > everybody
> >     > > >     > > > >> participating
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> and
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> leading
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the efforts around improving flaky tests.
> > From a
> >     > > >     > retrospective
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> point of
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> view, we could say that these efforts have
> > actually
> >     > > > revealed
> >     > > >     > > > >>> some
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> quite
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> interesting bugs and thus the time was well
> > spent
> >     > and
> >     > > > yielded
> >     > > >     > > > >>> good
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> results.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> What does the community think about making
> > another
> >     > > > sprint of
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> improvements
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> around tests followed up by a period of 1-2
> > weeks
> >     > > > during
> >     > > >     > which
> >     > > >     > > > >>> we
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> observe
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the failures closely to ensure that no
> > critical
> >     > paths
> >     > > > are
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> impacted?
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> If
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> we
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> are in a good shape by then, we could
> > continue the
> >     > > > release
> >     > > >     > > > >>> process
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> at
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> the same time have the advantage of giving
> >     > > > contributors more
> >     > > >     > > > >>> lead
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> time
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> finish their work to ensure it gets into
> the
> >     > release
> >     > > > in the
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> desired
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> quality.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to everybody for their
> efforts
> > during
> >     > > > the last
> >     > > >     > > > >>> weeks
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> improve the usability and stability of
> > MXNet. This
> >     > is
> >     > > > great
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> community
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> effort and a good example of a community
> > working
> >     > > > together
> >     > > >     > > > >>> towards
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> a
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> unified
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> goal!
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> Marco
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd0b0
> 74b01f46564194ea89b86c6a3e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%
> 3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Disabled+test%22
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 PM Roshani
> > Nagmote <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> As mentioned before, code freeze date is
> > today
> >     > July
> >     > > > 23rd.
> >     > > >     > > > >>> Please
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> try
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> get
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> your ongoing PRs merged by today.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if there are any
> > concerns or
> >     > need
> >     > > > more
> >     > > >     > > > >>> time.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM Anirudh
> > Acharya <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> anirudhkrec@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> @sandeep krishnamurthy <
> >     > > sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com>
> >     > > > the
> >     > > >     > > > >>> bug
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> fixes
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> in
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> the
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> R-package is something we have just
> begun,
> > there
> >     > > > will not
> >     > > >     > > > >> be
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> anything
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> significant to announce before the v1.3
> > code
> >     > > freeze.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM Steffen
> > Rochel <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> steffenrochel@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> To make it easier to find the
> discussions
> >     > related
> >     > > to
> >     > > >     > > > >>> project
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> proposals
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> I
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> added a column with a link to the thread
> > on dev@
> >     > > > for
> >     > > >     > > > >> most
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> projects.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Appreciate for the project owners to
> fill
> > in the
> >     > > > blanks
> >     > > >     > > > >>> and
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>> check
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that I
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> got the right threads.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steffen
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11 PM Roshani
> > Nagmote
> >     > <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kellen,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure. I will update the notes with the
> >     > > information.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM kellen
> >     > > sunderland <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Roshani,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to add 'TensorRT
> > Runtime
> >     > > >     > > > >>> Integration'
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> the
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> list
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upcoming features?  We'll target
> > getting the
> >     > > > release
> >     > > >     > > > >>> in
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> and
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> polished
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> by
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23rd.  Design proposal is here:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the lead contributor is Marek
> > Kolodziej.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Kellen
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 PM
> Roshani
> >     > Nagmote
> >     > > <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> roshaninagmote2@gmail.com
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting the process to prepare
> > for
> >     > Apache
> >     > > >     > > > >>> MXNet
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> (incubating)
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release. Please find project proposal
> > draft
> >     > for
> >     > > >     > > > >> this
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> release
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> here:
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <*
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Target feature freeze date is July
> > 23rd. A
> >     > > > release
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> candidate
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>> will
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> be
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around Monday, August 6th and voting
> > will
> >     > > > commence
> >     > > >     > > > >>>> from
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> then
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>> until
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thursday, August 9th. If you have any
> >     > > additional
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> features
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> in
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> progress
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to include it in this
> > release,
> >     > > please
> >     > > >     > > > >>> make
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>> sure
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>> to
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>> comment
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> so
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can update the release notes.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to add any other
> >     > > comments/suggestions.
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roshani
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>>
> >     > > >     > > > >>
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > > >
> >     > > >     > >
> >     > > >     >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message