From dev-return-3510-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Tue Jul 10 21:59:42 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 57223180634 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 21:59:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 79996 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2018 19:59:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79984 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2018 19:59:39 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:59:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4E2B6CB806 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:59:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.869 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.869 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmXZQ0j7GZu5 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com (mail-it0-f67.google.com [209.85.214.67]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 28A025F1B7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id 188-v6so365686ita.5 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2tKeqoRgKEG9B1/unAhh0dQwNB6N6vBXZfQBU0TvT6E=; b=YskH7l132s0puRCQmRIDbEsqDLUEGNEYnRDDc8HCYH3L7ZMTob38w+A8ap2g+e2qEy Ywk/1b2iUhDKDFJXt6zUBRzrInX1+EM0zhY9NjMqKaaA4X2ST51RAGHDCqQoGSu7Xw9L VTGYHvU4vlRNXKrgbIZmEcWCvVV310f8dpogtF0SjNNj5eV0P5SaiP6/YuJ6SHZk9Cu5 2+57MK7sBqJUXRh2aZdk/p7sMMOW1cvdYIea6E8dAJR6e9Vtg/sG3DbLS+0rk/Y5dPn/ 36T35RQUzW48xK7irL/AJQ63BYdvlNkvHSPeSnuYVlgZqMqGCzVEFGVmUkQje83QGiPO gsTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2tKeqoRgKEG9B1/unAhh0dQwNB6N6vBXZfQBU0TvT6E=; b=d8dfnyEh3IKlpDCJ/O2/+6PKrhYhBFlSA/DTj1Ipb0uKhWoiK//2rnhZ0j9IlZWStP h6f18PfWO0JLsty6zkoc680YCNivZlXr3hovTa6sDERzdOlSOPgJmFcveZQM7SH6lsUu ni08s8Pk+pNVYuvSa+5XqnniQATD809RZMsTlfcD34/6M4GHSbh1Vz7aIpwsctvLEXYR T6Ls8FvOF1vHDPgs384Ue/7z2SyIy5nGMtnD0a9qv8B9b/Gf+e7FYgYWzgvy28MVJbuZ mtZAftSOfd5xTKM+aztvo/65U3+jloXfl2B5v7F9XlbM3rgmASAM0RrrbWrzq5IryPRu +JPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1HHJRDIB6iausHguYk4eP2sd9VenCAaHwzEaJ0CV8eDxZp6+3x IMkbj9rE68PcX6ZdHUvk2QYuMdP+usH471zV0XBsbw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd7yRHavSEKczveh5PdgrjJGpdFk7wEEpXtUNnhGjZroPoCEGWuTO2GInjckdCPjnMNDBqp0i67y4GoXRhB1rw= X-Received: by 2002:a24:1688:: with SMTP id a130-v6mr21273268ita.74.1531252777092; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:59:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Anirudh Acharya Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 12:59:26 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: C++ api issue labeling To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d70bff0570aa912b" --000000000000d70bff0570aa912b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" There is another instance of label duplication - We have labels "Feature" ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/Feature ) and "Feature Request" ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/labels/Feature%20request ). I don't think there is much difference between these two labels. It would make sense to merge the "Feature" label into "Feature Request". Thanks Anirudh On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:50 PM Hagay Lupesko wrote: > Thank you everyone for your suggestions. > I will work with a committer to get this updated ASAP. > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:55 AM Marco de Abreu > wrote: > > > +1 to renaming to Backend > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:13 AM Hagay Lupesko > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Lin for your feedback. > > > Bumping again to get more feedback before concluding. > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:53 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with Hagay. Using "Backend" as label makes it much easier to > > > track. > > > > "C++" label only describes the language used in implementation, > > > "Backend" > > > > better describes the nature of the work (let's assume we change the > > > backend > > > > implementation from C++ to other languages in the future). > > > > > > > > Lin > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:09 AM Hagay Lupesko > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for chiming in and clarifying. > > > > > It seems that the "C++" label name is confusing for our community > > since > > > > it > > > > > can be interpreted as both the CPP API and the backend... > > > > > As an anecdote, this issue [1 > > > > > ] is > labeled > > > as > > > > > "C++" but is about the CPP API, not the backend. > > > > > > > > > > Should we just rename "C++" to "Backend" to avoid confusion? > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM Pedro Larroy < > > > > > pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Agree with Anirudh, they are different things. Maybe change the > > "C++" > > > > > label > > > > > > to "backend" would be more informative? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:11 PM Anirudh > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Hagay, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should keep these two labels seperate since they > mean > > > > > > different > > > > > > > things. > > > > > > > The C++ label refers to the issue for MXNet backend and the CPP > > > > package > > > > > > > refers to the CPP language binding for mxnet. > > > > > > > We can still make C++ API great again irrespective by filtering > > out > > > > CPP > > > > > > > package issues :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anirudh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Hagay Lupesko < > > lupesko@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey community, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was going over the open GitHub issues for MXNet, and > noticed > > > that > > > > > we > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > two labels for the CPP API: "CPP package", "C++" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wanted to suggest we remove "CPP package" and just stick to > > "C++" > > > > > > > > This will make it easier for the community to classify issues > > and > > > > > focus > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > making the C++ API great again ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if someone has any concerns, otherwise I will > find > > a > > > > > > > committer > > > > > > > > that I can work with to make this change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Hagay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --000000000000d70bff0570aa912b--