mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub
Date Sun, 22 Jul 2018 04:55:57 GMT
cu90 and cu90mkl are also available, see
https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/tags/

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya <anirudhkrec@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The python binding that is actively maintained is
>
> mxnet-mkl  1.2.1
>
>
> Other versions that use CUDA like mxnet-cu<xx> and mxnet-cu<xx>mkl are not
> actively maintained.
>
>
>
> -
>
> Anirudh
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:09 PM Mu Li <muli.cmu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Surprisingly only the python binding is actively maintained. I remember
> we
> > can easily push all bindings into docker hub through the script in
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/docker.
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Anirudh Acharya <anirudhkrec@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Docker Hub( https://hub.docker.com/u/mxnet/ ) currently hosts images
> of
> > > MXNet and its various bindings but it is not actively maintained.
> Should
> > we
> > > publish MXNet images to Docker Hub as part of the release process and
> > > actively maintain it?
> > >
> > > The pros of publishing docker images would be ease of use and access to
> > our
> > > users. Is this something that should be included as part of the release
> > > process? What does the community think?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Anirudh Acharya
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message