mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: C++ api issue labeling
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:54:51 GMT
+1 to renaming to Backend

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:13 AM Hagay Lupesko <lupesko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Lin for your feedback.
> Bumping again to get more feedback before concluding.
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:53 AM Lin Yuan <apeforest@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Hagay. Using "Backend" as label makes it much easier to
> track.
> >  "C++" label only describes the language used in implementation,
> "Backend"
> > better describes the nature of the work (let's assume we change the
> backend
> > implementation from C++ to other languages in the future).
> >
> > Lin
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:09 AM Hagay Lupesko <lupesko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks everyone for chiming in and clarifying.
> > > It seems that the "C++" label name is confusing for our community since
> > it
> > > can be interpreted as both the CPP API and the backend...
> > > As an anecdote, this issue [1
> > > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937>] is labeled
> as
> > > "C++" but is about the CPP API, not the backend.
> > >
> > > Should we just rename "C++" to "Backend" to avoid confusion?
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10937
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:39 PM Pedro Larroy <
> > > pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Agree with Anirudh, they are different things. Maybe change the "C++"
> > > label
> > > > to "backend" would be more informative?
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:11 PM Anirudh <anirudh2290@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hagay,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should keep these two labels seperate since they mean
> > > > different
> > > > > things.
> > > > > The C++ label refers to the issue for MXNet backend and the CPP
> > package
> > > > > refers to the CPP language binding for mxnet.
> > > > > We can still make C++ API great again irrespective by filtering out
> > CPP
> > > > > package issues :).
> > > > >
> > > > > Anirudh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Hagay Lupesko <lupesko@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was going over the open GitHub issues for MXNet, and noticed
> that
> > > we
> > > > > have
> > > > > > two labels for the CPP API: "CPP package", "C++"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wanted to suggest we remove "CPP package" and just stick to
"C++"
> > > > > > This will make it easier for the community to classify issues
and
> > > focus
> > > > > on
> > > > > > making the C++ API great again ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Let me know if someone has any concerns, otherwise I will find
a
> > > > > committer
> > > > > > that I can work with to make this change.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > Hagay
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message