mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Config for Scala Maven Package
Date Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:39:28 GMT
Hi Naveen,

Sorry I missed this. Can you please elaborate on how long it takes
typically for publishing the scala packages to maven before the vote?
I think if there is considerable churn in publishing these packages today,
we should not wait for the package for the vote as we may sacrifice our big
python user base
getting the release early for the scala user base.

Anirudh


On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:27 AM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com> wrote:

> All, I have created a guide to maven publish process here;
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> MXNet-Scala+Release+Process
> .
> Going forward, I propose that we include the scala maven packages also in
> our RC voting(I have updated the release-process already), I understand the
> maven packages use the same code base that is sent for voting. I
> encountered a quite bit of issues trying to publish the package, this could
> because we never did this past and I have automated as much as possible. I
> think there is value in getting these packages tested during the RC
> process.
>
> Sandeep,
> I am using what is available on AWS Deep Learning Base AMI which is 3.4 and
> CUDNN 7.0.5.
>
> Thanks, Naveen
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:57 AM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
> sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Naveen,
> >
> > Great work.
> > I was wondering about OpenCV and cuDNN
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sandeep
> >
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marco,
> > > For MKL/MKLDNN --> I don't think we should build since its still
> > > experimental. Its sad that MKLML was removed without a proper
> discussion,
> > > granted
> > > I have not tested with CUDA 9.2, I will building on a AWS Ubuntu
> instance
> > > that is built with CUDA 9.0, I presume it should work fine.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Marco de Abreu <
> > > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Naveen,
> > > >
> > > > thank you for driving the releases for the Scala packages!
> > > >
> > > > For CPU, I'd propose add MKL/MKLDNN builds.
> > > >
> > > > For GPU, do we have to specify the minor version of CUDA up front or
> > are
> > > > they interchangeable? CUDA 9.2, for example, received some quite
> > > > significant performance updates and it would be great if our users
> > could
> > > > use them.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Marco
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am working on publishing the Scala package from 1.2.0 release.
> What
> > > do
> > > > > you recommend should be the configuration for the Scala Packages
?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am thinking of the below
> > > > > For CPU build with
> > > > > OPENBLAS
> > > > > LAPACK
> > > > >
> > > > > For GPU build with
> > > > > OPENBLAS
> > > > > CUDA 9.0
> > > > > NCCL
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me know if you concerns or recommendations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Naveen
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message