mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Clojure Package
Date Sun, 10 Jun 2018 15:08:19 GMT
Oh great. Thanks, Chen for clarifying. That's correct, the Clojure uses the
Scala generation which makes use of this :)

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com> wrote:

> No need to be disappointed, Scala generated APIs by code generation for
> ndarray and symbol and if clojure depends on Scala it get those as well.
>
> > On Jun 10, 2018, at 3:40 PM, Chen HY <chenhy12345@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yep. An example is the cpp port used following code to generate op.h
> > automatically.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/
> cpp-package/scripts/OpWrapperGenerator.py
> >
> > It makes easier for everyone to follow up with the latest APIs.
> > It is disappointing if the python version supports the latest API but the
> > version of your favorite language doesn't.
> >
> > 2018-06-10 14:19 GMT+01:00 Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> this is fantastic, thanks for being a champ. I am glad to have you join
> us
> >> :). Yes, we would love to make it work and be available for our users,
> you
> >> can make features available iteratively. I understand you alone can't
> have
> >> everything in one go, I am hoping more contributors will join the
> effort.
> >>
> >> My guess is Chen is recommending generation of Clojure code from Scala.
> >>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Carin Meier <carinmeier@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Naveen,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks. I appreciate your help. I acknowledge there are some challenges
> >> in
> >>> trying to bring in a new language package, but I think if we can make
> it
> >>> work, it will be the best way for it to grow along with the MXNet
> project
> >>> and be a good fit with its goals and ecosystem long term.
> >>>
> >>> I added a confluence page of the general state of what is working and
> >> needs
> >>> help.
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> >>> Clojure+Package+Contribution+Needs.
> >>> Feel free to edit.
> >>>
> >>> Chen,
> >>>
> >>> I added the code generator use on the page as well. I don't fully
> >>> understand what you are proposing, but I would like to. If you could
> >>> provide some more details to help me, that would be great.
> >>>
> >>> - Carin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Chen HY <chenhy12345@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I personally think that is the reason the clojure package should use
> >> more
> >>>> code generator.
> >>>> It makes easier to build everything align with scala package.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2018-06-10 12:45 GMT+01:00 Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have called for contribution within my organization to help with
> >> the
> >>>>> review, some of them have shown interest and hope to see them help
> >> with
> >>>> the
> >>>>> review. Carin, I learnt you are popular to have given great talks
on
> >>>>> Clojure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could I please ask you document what functionality is working and
> >> what
> >>>>> parts of it need contribution.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In general I want to request a few things:
> >>>>> Good API documentation,
> >>>>> Examples, turn examples into integration tests.
> >>>>> Tests, more tests
> >>>>> Everything testable on CI.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the long term, We have to think how to maintain API compatibility
> >>> and
> >>>>> tests across language bindings.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks, Naveen
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 2:38 AM, YiZhi Liu <eazhi.liu@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Carin,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you for the great work. I'll do the review. As I have
no
> >>>>>> expertise in Clojure, it will really help to have people from
> >> Clojure
> >>>>>> community reviewing it as well :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2018-06-08 14:22 GMT-07:00 Carin Meier <carinmeier@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>> A couple of questions came up in regard to the PR and the
current
> >>>> test
> >>>>>>> suite state as well as the best way to review the PR since
it is
> >> a
> >>>> new
> >>>>>>> language binding.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In regards to the Clojure test suite, most of the Scala
test
> >> suite
> >>>> has
> >>>>>> been
> >>>>>>> ported over with the goal of having comparable coverage.
I can go
> >>>>> ahead a
> >>>>>>> put in a coverage tool to make that it a bit more transparent.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For reviewing, I have a couple people in the Clojure community
> >> that
> >>>> are
> >>>>>>> interested in collaborating in this project and I can ask
them
> >> for
> >>>> help
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> reviewing the PR in some way if that is helpful too.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm also open to other suggestions.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Carin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Carin Meier <
> >> carinmeier@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/
> >>> incubator-mxnet/pull/11205
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've ported in the content from the external github
repo (
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/gigasquid/clojure-mxnet), that has
been
> >> tested
> >>>> by
> >>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>> of the Clojure community, into the contrib directory.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is still lots more to do in relation to adding
tests,
> >>>>> benchmarks,
> >>>>>>>> and increasing stability, but I thought this might be
a good
> >> point
> >>>> to
> >>>>>> bring
> >>>>>>>> it in initially so that the other work can be reviewed
in
> >> smaller
> >>>>>> chunks.
> >>>>>>>> I also would like to get other people involved in making
it
> >>> better,
> >>>>> so I
> >>>>>>>> thought that having the base package in there would
be a good
> >>>> starting
> >>>>>>>> point for collaboration.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Feedback welcome.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> - Carin
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Carin Meier <
> >>> carinmeier@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone. I'll work on getting together a
PR with your
> >>>>> feedback
> >>>>>>>>> and post it here.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Chen HY <chenhy12345@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I would suggest using code generators in case
upstream library
> >>>>> adding
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> functions for arrays.
> >>>>>>>>>> It seems that cpp binding is using a code generator
and works
> >>>> fine.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2018-06-05 7:59 GMT+01:00 Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ~/mxnet/contrib/clojure-package good place
for the code.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> the package name org.apache.mxnet.contrib.clojure
? do you
> >>> need
> >>>>>> mxnet
> >>>>>>>>>>> again?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I forgot to request to run some benchmarks
and document. One
> >>> of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> reasons
> >>>>>>>>>>> users use MXNet is because of its performance
and we want to
> >>>>> ensure
> >>>>>>>>>> that we
> >>>>>>>>>>> maintain it across language bindings.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Also invite your other clojure programmer
buddies to the
> >> party
> >>>> :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Naveen
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Carin Meier
<
> >>>> carinmeier@gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh right. That's not a problem, I wonder
if something like
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.mxnet.contrib/clojure-mxnet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> would work?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If this seems like it is the right direction,
we could
> >> work
> >>>> out
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> details
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in a PR.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Naveen
Swamy <
> >>>>> mnnaveen@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree with your assessment that
we shouldn't need the
> >>> user
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> change
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> their code. I am not sure if we
can release under
> >>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.clojure-mxnet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we might have to stick with our
primary group id
> >>>>>> org.apache.mxnet
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be create a sub-package under it?
any creative ideas?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:29 PM,
Carin Meier <
> >>>>>> carinmeier@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback everyone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree on the contrib option.
I think it's a great
> >> path
> >>>>>> forward
> >>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> allow it time for feedback,
contribution by others,
> >> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> stabilization.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm understanding correctly,
that would mean
> >> putting
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>>>>> code
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~/mxnet/contrib/clojure-package
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and having the artifact jar
named
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> `org.apache.contrib.clojure-mxnet/clojure-mxnet`
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would recommend not having
the individual namespaces
> >>> of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> files
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib embedded in them, so
that if it graduates,
> >> users
> >>>>> won't
> >>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change their code, only the
dependency.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if this is
correct or if there are
> >>> any
> >>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>> ideas.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Carin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:03
PM, Naveen Swamy <
> >>>>>> mnnaveen@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that's a great idea
to bring in under
> >> contrib
> >>>> and
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> get
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user feedback
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2018, at 12:44
PM, sandeep
> >> krishnamurthy <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a commendable
work. Thanks a lot for all
> >> the
> >>>>> hard
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> smart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have put behind
this :-) I think this will be
> >> a
> >>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>>> value
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If people are not sure
about usage, can I suggest
> >>> this
> >>>>>>>>>> awesome
> >>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought in "contrib"
package? Invite and build the
> >>>>>> community
> >>>>>>>>>>> around
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clojure, stabilize and
increase the coverage, and
> >>>> based
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> usage
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development, graduate
it to main stable support
> >> from
> >>>>>> contrib.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suggestions and thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandeep
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018
at 12:27 PM, Ivan Serdyuk <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local.tourist.kiev@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A small comment,
about Scala API: main commiters
> >>> are
> >>>>>> hardly
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> available,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for Clojure -
I might suggest that it might be
> >>>>>> possible
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> enlight
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> future work, for
that package, for Clojure
> >>>> developers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun
4, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Naveen Swamy <
> >>>>>>>>>>> mnnaveen@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is great
effort and very nicely documented.
> >>>> When
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> surveyed
> >>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> day
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> job on the interest
for Scala packages there
> >> were
> >>> a
> >>>>> few
> >>>>>>>>>> people
> >>>>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically
were interested in the Clojure
> >>>> packages,
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who might
have tried and understand the
> >>>>>> complexity
> >>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> making
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scala
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work in Clojure.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am in support
of a MXNet-Clojure package, I
> >>>> request
> >>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests and integration
tests that can be ported
> >> to
> >>>> CI.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your
efforts.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Naveen
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun
1, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Carin Meier <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> carinmeier@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is always
a good thing to consider the cost
> >>> with
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> benefit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best to
explain what I see the tradeoffs to be.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First, I
wanted to clarify that it took
> >>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>> development
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the
Clojure package and the interop working
> >>>>>> properly
> >>>>>>>>>>> despite
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking
design on the confluence page :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of the
advantages of MXNet over its
> >>> competitors
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>> its
> >>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support.
The Clojure package would only
> >> increase
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> value of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposition
and bring new users and growth into
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> community.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However,
there is a cost associated with adding
> >>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>> language
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> support
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you pointed
out.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the
Clojure package right now is only
> >>> reliant
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> Scala
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jars
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maven, it
can exist outside the main project as
> >>> an
> >>>>>>>>>> independent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> repo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think that
would lessen the growth benefit both
> >>> to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> Clojure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to the
MXNet community to not be included
> >> as
> >>> a
> >>>>>> first
> >>>>>>>>>> class
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe
having first class Clojure support in
> >>>> MXNet
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> valuable,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost of
that support is up to the community to
> >>>>> decide.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there
a process for considering a new
> >> package
> >>> in
> >>>>>> MXNet?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Carin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri,
Jun 1, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Chen HY <
> >>>>>>>>>>> chenhy12345@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have
checked the issue and the confluence
> >> page,
> >>>> but
> >>>>>> still
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> curious.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clojure
and Scala are both JVM based
> >> languages.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They,
as well as many JVM based languages, can
> >>>> share
> >>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>> class
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at a
certain level.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why
should the community maintain two APIs for
> >>> two
> >>>>>>>>>> languages
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> share
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
packages with almost zero effort?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-06-01
21:58 GMT+01:00 Carin Meier <
> >>>>>>>>>> carinmeier@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I've been working on a Clojure package for
> >>> MXNet.
> >>>>>> Since
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Clojure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JVM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
language, the package leverages the great
> >> work
> >>> of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> existing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scala
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
package.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I would appreciate any feedback and testing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here is the original issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://github.com/apache/
> >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/issues/8971
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Architecture & Design:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://cwiki.apache.org/
> >>>> confluence/display/MXNET/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> MXNet+Clojure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
and the github repo for rapid testing and
> >> issue
> >>>>>> fixing
> >>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opening
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
official PR https://github.com/gigasquid/
> >>>>>> clojure-mxnet
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm also active in the slack channel so feel
> >>> free
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> ping me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Carin Meier
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chen
Hanyang 陈涵洋
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software
School Fudan University
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +86-138-1881-7745
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋
> >>>>>>>>>> Software School Fudan University
> >>>>>>>>>> +86-138-1881-7745
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Yizhi Liu
> >>>>>> DMLC member
> >>>>>> Amazon Web Services
> >>>>>> Vancouver, Canada
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋
> >>>> Software School Fudan University
> >>>> +86-138-1881-7745
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋
> > Software School Fudan University
> > +86-138-1881-7745
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message