From dev-return-2908-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Tue May 22 02:45:09 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BCAA918063A for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 02:45:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 83264 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2018 00:45:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83225 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2018 00:45:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2018 00:45:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4C727C01C4 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 00:45:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g7nirLCKSDd5 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 00:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 96D1A5F47D for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y72-v6so26534862lfd.2 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 17:45:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LbqT9zPdhd/SyfDtwLYRNU/rXdo35/96rnRqgXvI8Xo=; b=rnGleDr9S2zgCprsSqGRuROADtrgvTPFrKvTzUvkyQwK0AIQAAo7mfN+i6LGhexwRk cWg3rBGxgkFDlMvG14ZjtCgfAGJPDqZFFviufrWfUIchh86hk8zWvkXavGv5tD73gxIr i+rgcBhHdg2aIXgZ43zkAUBgzXK+EXjijpHYj3vdiAiLBW/cSRAJSbhUIWBPTTD3i++w xoY8Pg/MkNu8OO77IgmBYd8Q1aAI8qPFLzd2t6M3/JHZ8zazUdgzy2V0yblLyUdrITql LLXmGjjCkFCt/clsZA/G8fec4i3Ny/kNrM4ZUbZlfDw6SCgAycPWcXh+ngHmsBVmoKAn 4J4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=LbqT9zPdhd/SyfDtwLYRNU/rXdo35/96rnRqgXvI8Xo=; b=pKjJbyu0vpHh+KdylGXVzFYvEMg/LGxASpEf9td0a3zWCaYigc/O1pg6yH5mu9/hdT Z7nny9nBaQZMfll9Wqr81mvpdlDdtIPC8MRmXdVfA8XBPkpQW3PYkjqHAKLic7Wh1ov5 byaS6EZg1mGJD5iySjqNSLdM2iBMrq6CRAqzXZkfOC+yYyBQk2IIX2uKTSjcf8sMivSr 9BTCgN61wbvzBiO1a/EK/LNZ110GmLFjOsf/fiHXQTgPmbBFASQmXDd/wC94Obe2lFnZ l9x+TO7sMQK2rkRY6yXqqIDeSxVh0qZ7fSOL4JMwtiUAizvrBOd2euGniz1Exf1ylQOc p2Yw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweWwoofhQGmLxTfeKFykM05TKZulQJiJU4mJj39RQn0fguMe2bm uzdi4gAWxQoNP6HKgzKfydljF63EznjKr7psk9o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpJvCBrt5s3FF55DuQa0O6UafLwcojgq1kMcWOcpeZZrUK5SG1X4bUT0amHXRj/mA7LEony7XgThR5jux4sYYI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8150:: with SMTP id t16-v6mr13146026ljg.32.1526949901073; Mon, 21 May 2018 17:45:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a19:80c7:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2018 17:44:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Marco de Abreu Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 02:44:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Scala Packages in Maven To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000718039056cc0ba76" --000000000000718039056cc0ba76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Great, thanks a lot. This looks great! Is the result of your process going to be a script we can run to generate the artefacts? AFAIK, there's been attempts in the community to push towards CD, thus it'd be great if this process could directly be designed with an automated processing step in mind. -Marco On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Naveen Swamy wrote: > I am not sure who published it in the past, hence this discussion. > > I am already in the process of documenting them here, I clean it up and add > more info as I make progress. > 1) > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process# > ReleaseProcess-Step1.12.CreateScalaMavenPackages(WIP) > > 2) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet-Scala > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Marco de Abreu < > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Agree, we should make a proper assessment of what all these packages are > > before we try managing them. Do you know who published them before? > > > > Moving forward, it'd be great if you could document the entire process > (and > > all issues you encounter) in confluence. This would allow us to re-visit > > decisions later on and give us a source of information for questions > > exactly like this one. If we decide to add a new package to the publish > > process, we could just document it there and have a central point to look > > it up. > > > > -Marco > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Naveen Swamy > wrote: > > > > > I think this needs quite a bit of rework to clean up, currently I am > > > thinking to publish only the mxnet-full_2.11-{platform} x 3 and revisit > > > what the other packages should be published by the next release > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Naveen Swamy > > wrote: > > > > > > > I am working on publishing MXNet Scala packages of the 1.2 release to > > > > maven and observed that there are about 20 packages that needs to be > > > > published. I think this is too many of them and probably will confuse > > the > > > > users. > > > > > > > > I think we can cut down the number of packages, I wanted ask if > someone > > > > knows why the below packages were published and if it is ok not > publish > > > > them going forward. > > > > > > > > Proposing to not publish > > > > --- > > > > > > > > mxnet-full-parent_2.11 > > > > mxnet-parent_2.11 > > > > mxnet-scala-native-parent > > > > Any other packages that you propose to remove? > > > > --- > > > > > > > > ---Full List -- > > > > libmxnet-init-scala-{platform} x 2 > > > > libmxnet-scala-{platform} x 3 > > > > mxnet-core_2.11 > > > > mxnet-examples_2.11 > > > > mxnet-full-parent_2.11 > > > > mxnet-full_2.11-{platform} x 3 > > > > mxnet-infer_2.11 > > > > mxnet-init_2.11 > > > > mxnet-macros_2.11 > > > > mxnet-parent_2.11 > > > > mxnet-scala-init-native-parent > > > > mxnet-scala-native-parent > > > > mxnet-spark_2.11 > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts? > > > > > > > > Thanks, Naveen > > > > > > > > > > --000000000000718039056cc0ba76--