From dev-return-2911-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Tue May 22 06:37:34 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E2C8180638 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 06:37:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 51506 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2018 04:37:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50205 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2018 04:37:31 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:37:31 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 33C3E181625 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:19:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pjCtxQfe-RB7 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:19:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-f171.google.com (mail-ot0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F1C705F1F0 for ; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l22-v6so19414607otj.0 for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 21:19:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WbbleUrT5ggdP8Y1YizA/349FYEOD7n/LL+W+f88otE=; b=JmWZ2nd0/xDZcEMxbwfavuUETCuGu5l1euXO+Nrdja4o8kTJHa4pqpGQuz5Q61c5IP jZ8pGo8X7Kz8R2kuIi0RCu/7agnIf4VwtNN93Whqwn7C0M6Flu4pBaHVgC5/mVcSZmf0 51OECEF5syUrgYbHQnb7FlNVHt/zFsbYxHJSzgKy1gv9YrDK2SImS8naOflgnwjB2HP8 HtvSYHJ9HvtK2JmEGCNe2yW5wJMiHyAQw6z+xsN1OaKL+PITOXZPrxBXitt1pO+8OwTT fOmsDwvixpxeJw3CH1aaSzQYiKNK0MyBJavjGiUNn5Otp66aCRCII9sV09+4Z8Hygsp0 t1jQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WbbleUrT5ggdP8Y1YizA/349FYEOD7n/LL+W+f88otE=; b=BNhj7lFg1oXcSeCI14e9PJ7zp69H4T9Vwwdl0AspdXIl37HwAFrDnEQ5SIQT75lc7f zgUO+nhRAKlckPy1hrup0c/qQ/uEJlcX+8BB2Xf86Qy0QX06fvh7YWmnAArMxdtWNKje ryBUPHFBad49rkve2VXWaXzpy66bABGYYfaI/68mRdbN0H8f8zyeqSs9SZoHBxcPBTQY 08WZM6MG77aT2+wPCLvBYUexOY8wIgfx7jg8BSZu4Euxx//Fzpyc0gpgXuQ0GR+Wf7UN Ikho5TOmGE1ayshTs5vy9+MYyHmuzAj1fyk9B+NPHUP2jJTplmWHMunRaoj4oFp8JEqU 8v6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdtlJyhHnatLY2UtX6wvnMhsS2c8T71OJL73I43eLon7hu66zxE 39Y25v0ifaXcsosN2qLVoFJUVDqjGB2Of8qmnDQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpKlqwYcNieHE7u+eJVyQ6rPMcs8Bl9DeuN9xiz9Qgd+jJpbwMSAytNhBwpAvVKR5DQN1cm19svwfq8QL/sbi0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2ea7:: with SMTP id w36-v6mr15743546ota.123.1526962783117; Mon, 21 May 2018 21:19:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:5721:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2018 21:19:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Hagay Lupesko Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 21:19:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Scala Packages in Maven To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045e5fa056cc3ba85" --00000000000045e5fa056cc3ba85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" +1 for a CD for publishing to Maven +1 for reducing the number of packages. Do we really need more than full, infer and spark (x3 platforms)? On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Naveen Swamy wrote: > not at the moment, certainly is in my radar. Apache release requires a > committer's LDAP username/password. we could see how we can leverage CI > setup to do this > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Marco de Abreu < > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Great, thanks a lot. This looks great! > > > > Is the result of your process going to be a script we can run to generate > > the artefacts? AFAIK, there's been attempts in the community to push > > towards CD, thus it'd be great if this process could directly be designed > > with an automated processing step in mind. > > > > -Marco > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Naveen Swamy > wrote: > > > > > I am not sure who published it in the past, hence this discussion. > > > > > > I am already in the process of documenting them here, I clean it up and > > add > > > more info as I make progress. > > > 1) > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process# > > > ReleaseProcess-Step1.12.CreateScalaMavenPackages(WIP) > > > > > > 2) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet-Scala > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Marco de Abreu < > > > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Agree, we should make a proper assessment of what all these packages > > are > > > > before we try managing them. Do you know who published them before? > > > > > > > > Moving forward, it'd be great if you could document the entire > process > > > (and > > > > all issues you encounter) in confluence. This would allow us to > > re-visit > > > > decisions later on and give us a source of information for questions > > > > exactly like this one. If we decide to add a new package to the > publish > > > > process, we could just document it there and have a central point to > > look > > > > it up. > > > > > > > > -Marco > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:34 AM, Naveen Swamy > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think this needs quite a bit of rework to clean up, currently I > am > > > > > thinking to publish only the mxnet-full_2.11-{platform} x 3 and > > revisit > > > > > what the other packages should be published by the next release > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Naveen Swamy > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I am working on publishing MXNet Scala packages of the 1.2 > release > > to > > > > > > maven and observed that there are about 20 packages that needs to > > be > > > > > > published. I think this is too many of them and probably will > > confuse > > > > the > > > > > > users. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we can cut down the number of packages, I wanted ask if > > > someone > > > > > > knows why the below packages were published and if it is ok not > > > publish > > > > > > them going forward. > > > > > > > > > > > > Proposing to not publish > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > mxnet-full-parent_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-parent_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-scala-native-parent > > > > > > Any other packages that you propose to remove? > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > ---Full List -- > > > > > > libmxnet-init-scala-{platform} x 2 > > > > > > libmxnet-scala-{platform} x 3 > > > > > > mxnet-core_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-examples_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-full-parent_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-full_2.11-{platform} x 3 > > > > > > mxnet-infer_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-init_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-macros_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-parent_2.11 > > > > > > mxnet-scala-init-native-parent > > > > > > mxnet-scala-native-parent > > > > > > mxnet-spark_2.11 > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Naveen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --00000000000045e5fa056cc3ba85--