mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet(incubating) version 1.2.0.RC2
Date Thu, 03 May 2018 18:33:57 GMT
Correction: I was able to reproduce the issue with MKLDNN enabled on
master, but not on 1.2 branch.

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Anirudh <anirudh2290@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pedro and Naveen,
>
> I am unable to reproduce this issue with MKLDNN on the master but not on
> the 1.2.RC2 branch.
>
> Did the following on 1.2.RC2 branch:
>
> make -j $(nproc) USE_OPENCV=1 USE_BLAS=openblas USE_DIST_KVSTORE=0
> USE_CUDA=0 USE_CUDNN=0 USE_MKLDNN=1
> export MXNET_STORAGE_FALLBACK_LOG_VERBOSE=0
> export MXNET_TEST_SEED=11
> export MXNET_MODULE_SEED=812478194
> export MXNET_TEST_COUNT=10000
> nosetests-2.7 -v tests/python/unittest/test_module.py:test_forward_reshape
>
> Was able to do the 10k runs successfully.
>
> Anirudh
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Anirudh <anirudh2290@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Pedro and Naveen,
>>
>> Is this issue reproducible when MXNet is built with USE_MKLDNN=0?
>> Also, there are a bunch of MKLDNN fixes that didn't go into the release
>> branch. Is this issue reproducible on the release branch ?
>> In my opinion, since we have marked MKLDNN as experimental feature for
>> the release, if it is confirmed to be a MKLDNN issue
>> we don't need to block the release on it.
>>
>> Anirudh
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:58 AM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for raising this issue Pedro.
>>>
>>> -1(binding)
>>>
>>> We were in a similar state for a while a year ago, a lot of effort went
>>> to
>>> stabilize the tests and the CI. I have seen the PR builds are
>>> non-deterministic and you have to retry over and over (wasting resources
>>> and time) and hope you get lucky.
>>>
>>> Look at the dashboard for master build
>>> http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/
>>>
>>> -Naveen
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:11 AM, Pedro Larroy <
>>> pedro.larroy.lists@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > -1  nondeterminisitc failures on CI master:
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MXNET-396
>>> >
>>> > Was able to reproduce once in a fresh p3 instance with DLAMI  can't
>>> > reproduce consistently.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Anirudh <anirudh2290@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi all,
>>> > >
>>> > > As part of RC2 release, we have addressed bugs and some concerns that
>>> > were
>>> > > raised.
>>> > >
>>> > > I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating)
>>> > version
>>> > > 1.2.0.RC2. Voting will start now (Wednesday, May 2nd) and end at
>>> 12:50 PM
>>> > > PDT, Sunday, May 6th.
>>> > >
>>> > > Link to release notes:
>>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>> > > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes
>>> > >
>>> > > Link to release candidate 1.2.0.rc2:
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc2
>>> > >
>>> > > Voting results for 1.2.0.rc2:
>>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ebe561c609a8e32351dfe4aafc8876
>>> > > 199560336472726b58c3455e85@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>> > >
>>> > > View this page, click on "Build from Source", and use the source code
>>> > > obtained from 1.2.0.rc2 tag:
>>> > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
>>> > >
>>> > > (Note: The README.md points to the 1.2.0 tag and does not work at the
>>> > > moment.)
>>> > >
>>> > > Please remember to test first before voting accordingly:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1 = approve
>>> > > +0 = no opinion
>>> > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
>>> > >
>>> > > Anirudh
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message