mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Config for Scala Maven Package
Date Thu, 31 May 2018 15:39:29 GMT
Thanks for your work on this!

It's going to make it much easier for Scala, (and soon Clojure users), to
get up and running on MXNet.

- Carin

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com> wrote:

> All, I have created a guide to maven publish process here;
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> MXNet-Scala+Release+Process
> .
> Going forward, I propose that we include the scala maven packages also in
> our RC voting(I have updated the release-process already), I understand the
> maven packages use the same code base that is sent for voting. I
> encountered a quite bit of issues trying to publish the package, this could
> because we never did this past and I have automated as much as possible. I
> think there is value in getting these packages tested during the RC
> process.
>
> Sandeep,
> I am using what is available on AWS Deep Learning Base AMI which is 3.4 and
> CUDNN 7.0.5.
>
> Thanks, Naveen
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:57 AM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
> sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Naveen,
> >
> > Great work.
> > I was wondering about OpenCV and cuDNN
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sandeep
> >
> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marco,
> > > For MKL/MKLDNN --> I don't think we should build since its still
> > > experimental. Its sad that MKLML was removed without a proper
> discussion,
> > > granted
> > > I have not tested with CUDA 9.2, I will building on a AWS Ubuntu
> instance
> > > that is built with CUDA 9.0, I presume it should work fine.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Marco de Abreu <
> > > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Naveen,
> > > >
> > > > thank you for driving the releases for the Scala packages!
> > > >
> > > > For CPU, I'd propose add MKL/MKLDNN builds.
> > > >
> > > > For GPU, do we have to specify the minor version of CUDA up front or
> > are
> > > > they interchangeable? CUDA 9.2, for example, received some quite
> > > > significant performance updates and it would be great if our users
> > could
> > > > use them.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Marco
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I am working on publishing the Scala package from 1.2.0 release.
> What
> > > do
> > > > > you recommend should be the configuration for the Scala Packages
?
> > > > >
> > > > > I am thinking of the below
> > > > > For CPU build with
> > > > > OPENBLAS
> > > > > LAPACK
> > > > >
> > > > > For GPU build with
> > > > > OPENBLAS
> > > > > CUDA 9.0
> > > > > NCCL
> > > > >
> > > > > Let me know if you concerns or recommendations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Naveen
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message