mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chen HY <chenhy12...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MXNet Name Change?
Date Wed, 11 Apr 2018 19:49:53 GMT
At least people needs a way to speak it.
Just define its pronunciation as "mix-net" or "m-x-net" and use the agreed
one everywhere helps a lot.
Changing name is a bad idea.

2018-04-11 20:29 GMT+01:00 Mu Li <muli.cmu@gmail.com>:

> Agree that MXNet, the combination of Minerva and CXXNet, which can be
> interpreted as mixed-net, is hard to be pronounced. But rebranding a name
> is a very big decision. We need a very carefully designed marketing plan
> for it.
>
> A choice is that we can gradually refer MXNet as a backend, and talk more
> about the frontend Gluon.
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Thomas DELTEIL <
> thomas.delteil1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > FWIW Brainscript is actually a network definition language:
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cognitive-toolkit/
> > BrainScript-Network-Builder
> >
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > 2018-04-11 12:13 GMT-07:00 Chiyuan Zhang <pluskid@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > IIRC CNTK renamed to something like brainscript which does not seem to
> be
> > > very successful publicity campaign?
> > >
> > > Chiyuan
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:18 AM Chris Olivier <cjolivier01@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Should we consider renaming MXNet to something more "friendly"?
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, I think this may be related to adoption problems.
> > > >
> > > > MXNet, CMTK -- both seem sort of sterile and hard to use, don't they?
> > > >
> > > > Tensorflow, PyTorch, Caffe -- sound cool.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Semt ftom m ipohne
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋
Software School Fudan University
+86-138-1881-7745

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message