mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Fermi Architecture Support (pre-Kepler)
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2018 03:08:55 GMT
Tomorrow I am going to nuke pre-Kepler support. Speak now or forever hold
your peace.

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:08 AM Anirudh <anirudh2290@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 cudnn doesn't support this either.
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 2:03 AM kellen sunderland <
> kellen.sunderland@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I doubt practically speaking that many pre-Keplar devices would be that
> > useful for MXNet anyway.  +1 to dropping them and making our codebase
> more
> > readable / maintainable.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Marco de Abreu <
> > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Definitely in favour of dropping support!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:22 AM, Chris Olivier <cjolivier01@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Cuda9 nvcc no longer supports Fermi (pre-Kepler) architectures (2.0,
> > 2.1)
> > > > It appears that neither TensorFlow or PyTorch support Fermi.
> > > >
> > > > Are there any objections (with justification) to continue support for
> > > Fermi
> > > > (20, 21)?
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message