mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Disconnect all non-C API's from mxnet versioning
Date Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:18:39 GMT
-1 for different versioning, it not only be maintenance nightmare but also
more importantly confusing to users,


On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Marco de Abreu <
marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote:

> According to the discussion in the Scala thread, the release cycles would
> stay unchanged and are still part of the mxnet releases.
>
> Nan Zhu <zhunanmcgill@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 12. März 2018, 17:42:
>
> > how about release cycle?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Yuan Tang <terrytangyuan@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Marco de Abreu <
> > > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Tianqi Chen <tqchen@cs.washington.edu> schrieb am Mo., 12. März
> 2018,
> > > > 17:33:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Chris Olivier <
> > cjolivier01@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It has been proposed that all Non-C API's follow separate
> > versioning
> > > > from
> > > > > > the main mxnet C API/releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A +1 vote is in *favor of* using a different versioning for
all
> > > > > > non-C-API's, with each API (Scala, R, Julia, C++, etc.) having
> its
> > > own
> > > > > > version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A -1 vote is *against* using a different versioning for all
> > > > non-C-API's,
> > > > > > with all API's (Scala, R, Julia, C++, etc.) sharing the mxnet
> > > version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will conclude on Monday, March 19, 2018.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > -Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message