mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nan Zhu <zhunanmcg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] tracking code changes with JIRA by associating pull requests
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:28:16 GMT
Hi, Suneel,

how can we enable it? when we titled JIRA id in pull request, it will
synchronized automatically?

Best,

Nan

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org> wrote:

> All projects on Apache have Jira <---> Github integration in place.
>
> So its a solved problem - look at Flink, Kafka, Mahout, OpenNLP,
> PredictionIO and every other Apache project - all of them have this
> working.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Steffen Rochel <steffenrochel@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Nan - have you looked at plugin's to make the integration and
> > synchronization between Jira and github easier? E.g.
> > https://www.atlassian.com/blog/jira-software/connecting-jira-6-2-github
> f
> > Ideally one has one button in github to create a Jira and afterwards
> > changes on either github or Jira get synchronized.
> > What tools is ASF infra recommending?
> > Have you used
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/dev/github_jira_sync.py and
> > what is the recommended use case? How do get github issues updated from
> > Jira?
> >
> > Steffen
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:31 AM Indhu <indhubharathi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to the proposal
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018, 9:20 AM Nan Zhu <zhunanmcgill@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ideally,
> > > >
> > > > users report something fishy in github issue
> > > >
> > > > when confirmed that it is a bug or something to be improved, we
> should
> > > > create JIRAs
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Chris Olivier <
> cjolivier01@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > i believe that JIRAs are “work items@, while github issues are
> more
> > > like
> > > > > reporting. at least this is what Infra sort of claimed.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:30 AM Chris Olivier <
> cjolivier01@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:56 AM Marco de Abreu <
> > > > > > marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hello Nan,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Good suggestion!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> "hotfix which brings the broken build back to track" nitpicking,
> > > but I
> > > > > >> wouldn't consider this a tiny fix. There should also be
a jira
> > that
> > > > > >> reported the build being broken, so that shouldn't be a
problem
> to
> > > > link.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Very good idea with the automated script!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> How would we handle permissions? Which actions are
> non-committers
> > > able
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> execute and in which cases would a committer be required?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> How would we treat GitHub issues in future? As a board for
users
> > to
> > > > ask
> > > > > >> usage questions?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In order to improve user experience for new developers,
I'd like
> > to
> > > > > >> suggest
> > > > > >> that more experienced people might create jira tickets on
behalf
> > of
> > > > > others
> > > > > >> instead of telling them "please create a ticket". I think
we all
> > > made
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> experience with people from it department who blocked every
> > request
> > > > > until
> > > > > >> a
> > > > > >> ticket was created and assigned :P
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best regards,
> > > > > >> Marco
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Am 23.02.2018 6:07 nachm. schrieb "CodingCat" <
> > codingcat@apache.org
> > > >:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi, all
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> To make the changes in code base more trackable,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I would propose to link each PR with the a JIRA from now
on:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 1. most of PRs should be titled as [MXNET-???][MODULE_NAME]
PR
> > short
> > > > > >> description, where MXNET-??? is the JIRA ID, MODULE_NAME
can be
> > > > python,
> > > > > >> scala, symbol, etc.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 2. only the very tiny fix, e.g. fix a typo, remove some
unused
> > > > > variables,
> > > > > >> or the hotfix which brings the broken build back to track,
can
> be
> > > > filed
> > > > > >> without JIRA ID in title,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> In JIRA side, to link the issue with an arrived PR, we can
run a
> > > > script
> > > > > >> like https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/dev/github_
> > > > > jira_sync.py
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> update JIRA status (can be run in Jenkins)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The benefits of applying such a flow include (but not limited
> to)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 1. facilitate the release process:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> e.g., as long as tagging each JIRA with the correct affected
> > version
> > > > and
> > > > > >> fixed version, the release manager can quickly identify
what are
> > the
> > > > > >> changes applied in this version; or we can quickly identify
> > whether
> > > > > there
> > > > > >> is any blocker issue in the JIRA
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 2. trackable changes
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> any changes in MXNET can be quickly searched through JIRA
or
> even
> > > > > through
> > > > > >> Google (JIRA looks like did something makes it more indexable
by
> > > > > Google),
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> If the vote gets pass,  the plan in the near horizon includes
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 1. update JIRA with the modules names
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 2. write runbook for release manager/committer for releasing
new
> > > > > >> version/merging patches, as well as contributors about the
usage
> > of
> > > > JIRA
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> 3. push the changes to the existing and coming PRs (this
also
> > needs
> > > > the
> > > > > >> collaboration across the whole committer team)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The vote will end at 12:00 p.m. of March 2nd, 2018
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Nan
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message