From dev-return-2026-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Thu Jan 25 22:22:38 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8B6180651 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:22:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5E8D8160C3D; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A6680160C17 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:22:37 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 3539 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2018 21:22:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3520 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2018 21:22:36 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:22:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A5CF41808DE for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:22:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6TcLmt-Bt7Lg for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F07D05FC0C for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f136so11630089lff.8 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:22:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WDiVuBaEhMMPKPgL8+HmMvEll9udC9ZDeARYAVyKvrk=; b=vItVD1hf0/yxB2chPP3g9nruSMM77QFS/SNqXoy3L6CVxnAxceWVEtQxQ5JSyAUmDj WIvWBbWRXVL80MjAdE+VrJURugsKrQ7nuTOF8BO5zTHCuRb9Jk35E73zn67VvzBG3fg8 82rnMUegCgNZmHVRzfoPn3di/FZdUS0l9pdjSpizS8V4M8XyngTXbEzppdesH/9jfhc9 VZs/NFchWNBB4t8FaOqONWQpzeh2Hz3Wh8h2yfYpdMxROD3ztECZEoHLByO2h1EvRzRU P2IpIGtAFeLkeApCdnJKgvaNnZuMVhKj/G721D1k8V7w/YbRmZ0FyFfUTSm8qKJ7ecZi aDOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WDiVuBaEhMMPKPgL8+HmMvEll9udC9ZDeARYAVyKvrk=; b=F8bURQHBssbI1+/nzemTg6k1A3QrwXgv+owpy2I5Z9ON1h5dwM5Xkgewo6Q0IlKT9L lCDugyUvMDru3MHXbHSQQIAbSF6BksIIq4AwEtmS649oT4W5WwQsnXs56WXRLz8utDAv HFiZ4F8xU1I9pSdDO9QnFEkOkqZYbw7VwRBd8rENt61/Xu6z9yEgPff6j9AdXpDNTdkM 6sCFdEJEynA0w/5ZBbYfQdLv0FK0hR/vRqvQElXjJFqH+R/hoNoDsbzHMj/iCy5H6kyW zAi+W16+uMd80cVAkhxTx7P/RVBWRzOS44nzKNLovTz4G/VeuJyv72nabgRq37Bpbgaj wc/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytd9uo47/+BKrdQE7QKoS2srhmm0zA5CueGm5ovBHmwiRuY8b4OU 1hzlSTaYxD7rWb2G1yrmnBBF04KofuFd1UB8O1na+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225unQjwvE977YTMfJqXEASBkDr4u8Fe1WKG/EgfLDNHLxRmk00kg8ZRqYupnhAFp+CD93oO0ciLQ+nBub/Ud20= X-Received: by 10.25.222.147 with SMTP id i19mr6944630lfl.75.1516915352870; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:22:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.169.206 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:21:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Marco de Abreu Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:21:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: test_operator_gpu.test_correlation fails on Python 3 MKLML GPU To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f4d26c324a90563a06041" --f403045f4d26c324a90563a06041 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I just wanted to bring a bit more attention to this case. We have had at least 3 runs fail in the last 48 hours and it seems like an actual bug has been introduced. - http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/incubator-mxnet/detail/master/284/pipeline - http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/incubator-mxnet/detail/PR-9560/1/pipeline - http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/incubator-mxnet/detail/PR-9522/1/pipeline Best regards, Marco On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Marco de Abreu < marco.g.abreu@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > we just had a test failure in test_operator_gpu.test_correlation (sourced > from unittest/test_operator.py) on the master branch (tracked at > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9553). > > Could somebody please have a look? > > Best regards, > Marco > --f403045f4d26c324a90563a06041--