mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Stabilizing Apache MXNet CI build system
Date Fri, 20 Oct 2017 23:18:32 GMT
Thanks.

Is there any way to work the feather into it?

i.e.  https://goo.gl/images/BU4dnG

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Seb Kiureghian <sebouhdk@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://imgur.com/a/aADkA
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Chris Olivier <cjolivier01@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Why don;t we look into fully managed AWS CodeBuild?  It maintains
> > everything. It's also compatible with Jenkins.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Tianqi Chen <tqchen@cs.washington.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Tianqi
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:39 PM Mu Li <muli.cmu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems that the Apache CI is quite overloaded these days, and
> MXNet's
> > > CI
> > > > pipeline is too complex to run there. In addition, we may need to add
> > > more
> > > > devices, e.g. macpro and rasbperry pi, into the server, and more
> tasks
> > > such
> > > > as pip build. It means a lot of requests to the Infra team.
> > > >
> > > > We can reuse our previous Jenkins server at http://ci.mxnet.io/. But
> > we
> > > > probably need a dedicate developer to maintain it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:01 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <
> > > > sandeep.krishna98@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am hereby opening up a discussion thread on how we can stabilize
> > > Apache
> > > > > MXNet CI build system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems:
> > > > >
> > > > > ========
> > > > >
> > > > > Recently, we have seen following issues with Apache MXNet CI build
> > > > systems:
> > > > >
> > > > >    1. Apache Jenkins master is overloaded and we see issues like
-
> > > unable
> > > > >    to trigger builds, difficult to load and view the blue ocean and
> > > other
> > > > >    Jenkins build status page.
> > > > >    2. We are generating too many request/interaction on Apache
> Infra
> > > > team.
> > > > >       1. Addition/deletion of new slave: Caused from scaling
> > activity,
> > > > >       recycling, troubleshooting or any actions leading to change
> of
> > > > slave
> > > > >       machines.
> > > > >       2. Plugins / other Jenkins Master configurations.
> > > > >       3. Experimentation on CI pipelines.
> > > > >    3. Harder to debug and resolve issues - Since access to master
> and
> > > > slave
> > > > >    is not with the same community, it requires Infra and community
> to
> > > > dive
> > > > >    deep together on all action items.
> > > > >
> > > > > Possible Solutions:
> > > > >
> > > > > ==============
> > > > >
> > > > >    1. Can we set up a separate Jenkins CI build system for Apache
> > MXNet
> > > > >    outside Apache Infra?
> > > > >    2. Can we have a separate Jenkins Master in Apache Infra for
> > MXNet?
> > > > >    3. Review design of current setup, refine and fill the gaps.
> > > > >
> > > > > @ Mentors/Infra team/Community:
> > > > >
> > > > > ==========================
> > > > >
> > > > > Please provide your suggestions on how we can proceed further and
> > work
> > > on
> > > > > stabilizing the CI build systems for MXNet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, if the community decides on separate Jenkins CI build system,
> > > what
> > > > > important points should be taken care of apart from the below:
> > > > >
> > > > >    1. Community being able to access the build page for build
> > statuses.
> > > > >    2. Committers being able to login with apache credentials.
> > > > >    3. Hook setup from apache/incubator-mxnet repo to Jenkins
> master.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Irrespective of the solution we come up, I think we should
> initiate a
> > > > > technical design discussion on how to setup the CI build system.
> > > > Probably 1
> > > > > or 2 pager documents with the architecture and review with Infra
> and
> > > > > community members.
> > > > >
> > > > > ***There were few proposal and discussion on the slack channel, to
> > > reach
> > > > > wider community members, moving that discussion formally to this
> > list.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > My Proposal: Option 1 - Set up separate Jenkins CI build system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sandeep
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sandeep Krishnamurthy
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message