Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA25A200CF3 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E8BD31609CA; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 38ABE1609C3 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:31:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 12686 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2017 21:31:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12675 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2017 21:31:55 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D37E1185D3F for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INzcPgtJtudn for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id D736B5FE64 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12658 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2017 21:31:52 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:52 +0000 Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com (mail-it0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id C62711A0019 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id v19so477483ite.0 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:31:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiid8mEaplT1Vs0l/Fy9Czdeti8yyBQogGAk7JX97mEDdakfD2a ixLMPsuB9Qtx37KgNyl8wGHenSLa89SoPYiY1cg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAdIeZYRPsM51jOiJ7AUEB3q8zAUfFQNXreqfg7Muku6Vu+3zTTf7WTwOggTts1TvQBwjXtGUQ+3sjX7r25+BM= X-Received: by 10.36.20.149 with SMTP id 143mr172580itg.63.1505338311288; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:31:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B2FF959-0A42-4637-9E78-26067E68A4CC@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B2FF959-0A42-4637-9E78-26067E68A4CC@gmail.com> From: Henri Yandell Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:39 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: MXNet: Run PR builds on Apache Jenkins only after the commit is reviewed To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143f3004fbafa055918e3da" archived-at: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:31:58 -0000 --001a1143f3004fbafa055918e3da Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Side note: There is no "we". The below should say something like "I would like to propose...", or "As part of my work at , I would like to propose..." if it's coming from a team at your day job and you don't want to hog all the glory :) If it truly is "we", then the email should end with the "we" that the email is from. For example a release announcement from me would say "We are proud to release" and would end with "Hen, on behalf of the Apache MXNet project"= . Hen On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 17:50 Meghna Baijal wrote: > Hi All, > We would like to initiate a change in the way the PR builds are being > triggered. At the moment, every time a Pull Request is created, a build > gets triggered on Jenkins. Additional builds also get triggered due to > changes to the same PR. > Too many PR builds leads to resource starvation and very long queues and > long build times. Hence we would like to add some checks where a human > reviewer manually marks it to something like =E2=80=9Cok to build=E2=80= =9D before a PR > build is triggered. > > Do you think this approach would be helpful and we should move forward > with it? > > Thanks, > Meghna Baijal > > > > --001a1143f3004fbafa055918e3da--