mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Discussion Forums?
Date Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:51:23 GMT
An advantage of apache is apache people from other projects.  If you use
the standard mail lists that will make it clearer for other developers from
other groups to pick up your list and contribute.  I mean I would know how
to find your list easily.

But If you advertise something different than you will need to make sure
everyone knows your list.  Unless you don't care about it. But in which
case you would only be using the apache brand, not the whole thing.


Just my 2 cents.

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:48 PM Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks, Seb.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Seb Kiureghian <sebouhdk@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "sebouhdk@gmail.com" <sebouhdk@gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, September 17, 2017 at 4:30 PM
> To: "dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org" <dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org>
> Cc: "mattmann@apache.org" <mattmann@apache.org>, "
> general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Discussion Forums?
>
>
>
> are you making it so that the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet
> (note emphasis) to not be on Apache infrastructure?
>
>
>
> Discourse is open source so we can host it on Apache infrastructure and
> include it on our site. I will suggest PonyMail on the original thread and
> see what the community thinks. Thanks for your feedback Chris.
>
>
>
> Seb
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can’t stress this enough – tooling is all fine and dandy, but are you
> making it so that
> the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet (note emphasis) to not be
> on Apache
> infrastructure?
>
> There is no official policy other than if it didn’t happen on the list, it
> didn’t happen.
> Decisions must be made on the mailing list, and frankly, as a casual
> observer of the dev
> list I’m not entirely sure that decisions are occurring on the list right
> now.
>
> Is there a reason not to use PonyMail? Or at least give it a try?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 9/17/17, 4:16 PM, "Seb Kiureghian" <sebouhdk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi Chris,
>
>     Members of the Apache MXNet community have pointed to the high level of
>     activity on Pytorch's forum <https://discuss.pytorch.org/> as a
> reason to
>
>     use Discourse. Discourse has a lot of great community features which
> make
>     it easier to have a discussion, follow specific questions, and learn
>     quickly, particularly for users new to deep learning. Discourse is open
>     source (GNU GPL) API and can also be integrated with the Apache mailing
>     lists, the way Nabble and PonyMail are. Is there an official stance or
> set
>     of guidelines wrt forums? Any guidance is appreciated.
>
>     Thanks!
>     -Seb Kiureghian
>
>
>
>     On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org>
>     wrote:
>
>     > What’s wrong with lists.apache.org as a forum?
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     > Chris
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > On 9/15/17, 9:26 PM, "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>     >
>     >     The MXNet community have been discussing the possibilities of a
>     > discussion
>     >     forum. I suspect I'm out of date on the topic. Has there been
> Incubator
>     >     discussion on forums in the past few years? Are there projects
> running
>     >     forums? Discourse seems to be the current fashion.
>     >
>     >     My dated assumption is that Apache tends to be -1 to forums, but
> then
>     > we
>     >     had Nabble eking an existence on top of our lists as a
> semi-forum, then
>     >     StackExchange creating de facto Q&A forums; so perhaps user
> forums are
>     > a
>     >     thing now; or perhaps folk have their user@ mailing lists
> integrated
>     > with
>     >     discourse/stackoverflow etc?
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >
>     >     Hen
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
Clebert Suconic

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message