mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Seb Kiureghian <sebou...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Discussion Forums?
Date Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:30:04 GMT
>
> are you making it so that the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet
> (note emphasis) to not be on Apache infrastructure?


Discourse is open source so we can host it on Apache infrastructure and
include it on our site. I will suggest PonyMail on the original thread and
see what the community thinks. Thanks for your feedback Chris.

Seb

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I can’t stress this enough – tooling is all fine and dandy, but are you
> making it so that
> the default way to interact with *Apache* MXNet (note emphasis) to not be
> on Apache
> infrastructure?
>
> There is no official policy other than if it didn’t happen on the list, it
> didn’t happen.
> Decisions must be made on the mailing list, and frankly, as a casual
> observer of the dev
> list I’m not entirely sure that decisions are occurring on the list right
> now.
>
> Is there a reason not to use PonyMail? Or at least give it a try?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 9/17/17, 4:16 PM, "Seb Kiureghian" <sebouhdk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi Chris,
>
>     Members of the Apache MXNet community have pointed to the high level of
>     activity on Pytorch's forum <https://discuss.pytorch.org/> as a
> reason to
>     use Discourse. Discourse has a lot of great community features which
> make
>     it easier to have a discussion, follow specific questions, and learn
>     quickly, particularly for users new to deep learning. Discourse is open
>     source (GNU GPL) API and can also be integrated with the Apache mailing
>     lists, the way Nabble and PonyMail are. Is there an official stance or
> set
>     of guidelines wrt forums? Any guidance is appreciated.
>
>     Thanks!
>     -Seb Kiureghian
>
>
>
>     On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org>
>     wrote:
>
>     > What’s wrong with lists.apache.org as a forum?
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     > Chris
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > On 9/15/17, 9:26 PM, "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>     >
>     >     The MXNet community have been discussing the possibilities of a
>     > discussion
>     >     forum. I suspect I'm out of date on the topic. Has there been
> Incubator
>     >     discussion on forums in the past few years? Are there projects
> running
>     >     forums? Discourse seems to be the current fashion.
>     >
>     >     My dated assumption is that Apache tends to be -1 to forums, but
> then
>     > we
>     >     had Nabble eking an existence on top of our lists as a
> semi-forum, then
>     >     StackExchange creating de facto Q&A forums; so perhaps user
> forums are
>     > a
>     >     thing now; or perhaps folk have their user@ mailing lists
> integrated
>     > with
>     >     discourse/stackoverflow etc?
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >
>     >     Hen
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message