mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From shiwen hu <yajiedes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ICLAs vs Contributors
Date Wed, 30 Aug 2017 06:54:06 GMT
yes.nobody tell them.

2017-08-30 14:43 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org>:

> They're not committers, so I doubt anyone has requested they sign a ICLA.
> Looking at the GitHub history, some haven't been active in a while.
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:07 PM, shiwen hu <yajiedesign@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a
> > boot page.
> >
> > 2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org>:
> >
> > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
> > >
> > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411
> contributors):
> > >
> > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
> > >
> > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> > > covered by a CLA:
> > >
> > > 8:sneakerkg
> > > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> > > 17:hjk41
> > > 18:mavenlin
> > > 19:tornadomeet
> > > 20:winstywang
> > > 21:jermainewang
> > > 22:qiaohaijun
> > > 23:vchuravy
> > > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> > > 26:howard0su
> > > 28:sbodenstein
> > > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> > > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> > > 36:yanqingmen
> > >
> > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
> > >
> > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those
> above
> > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> > > determine how far down the list to go.
> > >
> > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message