mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From shiwen hu <yajiedes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ICLAs vs Contributors
Date Wed, 30 Aug 2017 06:55:49 GMT
open some issue and @them

2017-08-30 14:54 GMT+08:00 shiwen hu <yajiedesign@gmail.com>:

> yes.nobody tell them.
>
> 2017-08-30 14:43 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org>:
>
>> They're not committers, so I doubt anyone has requested they sign a ICLA.
>> Looking at the GitHub history, some haven't been active in a while.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:07 PM, shiwen hu <yajiedesign@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a
>> > boot page.
>> >
>> > 2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
>> > >
>> > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411
>> contributors):
>> > >
>> > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
>> > >
>> > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
>> > > covered by a CLA:
>> > >
>> > > 8:sneakerkg
>> > > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
>> > > 17:hjk41
>> > > 18:mavenlin
>> > > 19:tornadomeet
>> > > 20:winstywang
>> > > 21:jermainewang
>> > > 22:qiaohaijun
>> > > 23:vchuravy
>> > > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
>> > > 26:howard0su
>> > > 28:sbodenstein
>> > > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
>> > > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
>> > > 36:yanqingmen
>> > >
>> > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
>> > >
>> > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those
>> above
>> > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need
>> to
>> > > determine how far down the list to go.
>> > >
>> > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login;
>> so
>> > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
>> > >
>> > > Hen
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message