mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3
Date Wed, 30 Aug 2017 01:24:08 GMT
Thanks John. I will create the JIRA tickets to track your inputs as requested. 

Meghna
 
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:14 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes:
> 
> - The NOTICE file is wrong.  Unless the dependencies listed have explicit
> notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the
> NOTICE file.
> - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all
> contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of
> agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has
> been handled in the past).
> 
> Please create JIRAs to track these.
> 
> John
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org <mailto:bayard@apache.org>>
wrote:
> 
>> I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all
>> contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project.
>> 
>> We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the
>> largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording
>> there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are
>> covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of
>> Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here.
>> 
>> To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said
>> "Copyright <year> by Contributors".
>> 
>> Hen
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <apache.clr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Henri,
>>> 
>>> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed
>> to
>>> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part
>> of
>>> IP Clearance.
>>> 
>>> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
>>> 
>>> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator
>>> who are not now committers?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Craig
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release.
>>> Will
>>>> review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar.
>>>> 
>>>> There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code
>> has
>>>> been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub.
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dominic,
>>>>> 
>>>>> One question, from looking a second time.  Was MXNet always Apache
>>> Licensed
>>>>> (prior to coming to the ASF)?
>>>>> 
>>>>> John
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni <
>>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far.
>>>>>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and
>> vote?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this
>> project?
>>>>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dom
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament <
>> johndament@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding.  Usually mentors review
>>> releases.
>>>>>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it?  Due to there
>> being
>>>>> no
>>>>>>> SGA its a harder release to review.  I also need to cross check
>> ICLAs
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> files that have changed license.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" <
>>>>>>> dominic.divakaruni@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can
the
>>>>>>> committers
>>>>>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh
in on
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating)
>>>>> 0.11.0
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> still open.
>>>>>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04
PM UTC.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package becauseā€¦
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Meghna
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal <
>>>>>>> meghnabaijal2017@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating)
0.11.0,
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>> candidate 3.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the
release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
<
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea
>>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Result thread:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
<
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13
>>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests,
etc. can be
>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>> at:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3
<
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd
and
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> found here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>>>>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd <
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/
>>>>>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> KEY files are available here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release,
see:
>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate <
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0.
>>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200>
Cell
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni
>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>>> clr@apache.org <mailto:clr@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo <http://db.apache.org/jdo>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message