mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Licensing update per code move
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 17:51:45 GMT
I am not aware of a shorter version. Below is the standard header that
needs to go into all the files.

/*
 * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
 * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
 * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
 * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
 * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
 * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */






On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Tianqi Chen <tqchen@cs.washington.edu>
wrote:

>  I did notice that there is a shorter version of the header. I think we
> could use that ?
>
> Tianqi
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:58 AM Suneel Marthi <smarthi@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Yes its absolutely necessary that every file have a Apache license
> header -
> > and every project that comes into Apache does that.
> > No, its got to be at file level and not folder.
> >
> > Lookup RAT plugin - what all projects use to ensure that files have
> license
> > headers.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Naveen Swamy <mnnaveen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > that is a lot of edits to the source files just to include the
> > > license terms, this will also change the history of the files. Can we
> > add a
> > > license file at a folder level and do this next time we touch the file?
> > > Also Is this absolutely necessary?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thought I'd describe one of the first sets of changes we should make
> > when
> > > > the code moves to an Apache git repo.
> > > >
> > > > We should update the licensing.
> > > >
> > > > 1) We should update the NOTICE file, once on Apache's source control,
> > to
> > > > say:
> > > >
> > > >  Apache MXNet
> > > > Copyright 2017 The Apache Software Foundation
> > > > This product includes software developed at
> > > >  The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > > >
> > > > 2) Every source file (basically all files bar images, binaries and
> test
> > > > data) should have a commented source header:
> > > >
> > > > Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
> > > > or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
> > > > distributed with this work for additional information
> > > > regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
> > > > to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
> > > > "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
> > > > with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > > >
> > > >   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > > >
> > > > Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> > > > software distributed under the License is distributed on an
> > > > "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
> > > > KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
> > > > specific language governing permissions and limitations
> > > > under the License.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Described on this page: https://www.apache.org/legal/
> src-headers.html
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Hope that's useful :)
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message