mxnet-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 19:27:54 GMT
MXNet's backend is written in C++, which is not able to use the
java interface.

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Are you guys able to use this (which is what we use in Apache Toree)?
>
> https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq
>
> Which has been successfully relicensed?
> https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq/blob/master/LICENSE
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet
> is
> > removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies.
> >
> > ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static
> > compiling.
> >
> > They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't
> made
> > much progress, though they did relicense JeroMQ (Java
> > wrapper/implementaiton) last year.
> >
> > In the last few months they've made a lot of progress towards
> relicensing:
> > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE
> >
> > I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to
> continue
> > using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend
> > towards MPL 2.0.
> >
> > Any concerns before I do so?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Hen
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message