Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89C8200C0E for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:12:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B71F7160B46; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CFE2160B41 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 18:12:40 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 33995 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2017 17:12:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mxnet.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33979 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2017 17:12:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:12:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B1096185DBB for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:12:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.018 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.018 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AnKo3lxxUxcG for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 84A125F2F0 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33964 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2017 17:12:36 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:12:36 +0000 Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 933D71A06AD for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v96so65336197ioi.0 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:12:36 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLgilAWPPDvDS4XpfgrCmm729QJy6UEVbHbP6SujGoL+a/TBFvSZksG0ZcXGNTcZrxXjErQ+lK9HX3G9g== X-Received: by 10.107.21.196 with SMTP id 187mr2875394iov.105.1485969155843; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:12:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.33.198 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:12:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Henri Yandell Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:12:35 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposed Board report To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148d54aae92f905477b27e5 archived-at: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:12:41 -0000 --001a1148d54aae92f905477b27e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Report posted at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017 and ready for mentor sign offs. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Markus Weimer wrote: > On 2017-02-01 05:27, Chiyuan Zhang wrote: > >> One minor comment: "date of last release -- no release yet", does the >> "release" here only include mature release, i.e. things that are beyond >> version 1.0? Or it means something under the name Apache MXNet? Otherwise, >> there seem to be quite a few past releases? >> > > "release" here refers to releases made as a podling adhering to the Apache > standards for a release (legal and technical). Hence, past releases are not > reported here. > > That said, there is no reason to reset the version number or anything. I > believe REEF was at 0.1x when we entered incubation and we just kept > incrementing the version number. > > Markus > --001a1148d54aae92f905477b27e5--