Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-mina-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89505 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2010 12:13:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2010 12:13:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22027 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 12:13:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mina-users-archive@mina.apache.org Received: (qmail 21606 invoked by uid 500); 26 Aug 2010 12:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@mina.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@mina.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@mina.apache.org Received: (qmail 21589 invoked by uid 99); 26 Aug 2010 12:13:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:13:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 192.114.187.210 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of gitzhaki@nextnine.com) Received: from [192.114.187.210] (HELO owa.nextnine.com) (192.114.187.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:13:08 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BG7H BvkS B0xK CFZC Cyyc DLu+ EBkJ E2RV FFxa FjE+ GNA8 GlIG IisJ JNiG J8sI KMc6;1;dQBzAGUAcgBzAEAAbQBpAG4AYQAuAGEAcABhAGMAaABlAC4AbwByAGcA;Sosha1_v1;7;{377A5AD4-FF4F-4159-A96A-A604CE691115};ZwBpAHQAegBoAGEAawBpAEAAbgBlAHgAdABuAGkAbgBlAC4AYwBvAG0A;Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:16:24 GMT;cwBlAHMAcwBpAG8AbgAuAGcAZQB0AEMAcgBlAGEAdABpAG8AbgBUAGkAbQBlACAALQAgAG0AaQBsAGwAaQAgAHYAcwAgAG4AYQBuAG8A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB4518.877760FD" x-cr-puzzleid: {377A5AD4-FF4F-4159-A96A-A604CE691115} Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: session.getCreationTime - milli vs nano Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:16:24 +0300 Message-ID: <6F56CAD6A0A497488D2B4C0DAE5C54612D897A@mailsrvnew.domain.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: session.getCreationTime - milli vs nano Thread-Index: ActFGICU6x4/t0uqRU+tuZiBFGNnFQ== From: "Guy Itzhaki" To: ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB4518.877760FD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear mina team and users, =20 According to the session.getCreationTime() java doc the method returns the session's creation time in nanoseconds, however I dig in and found out that the creation time is actually in milli (which is great as I can create Date using milli and not using nano) =20 Can you approve that the actual implementation (returning milli) is the correct one? (In this case I would recommend you update the java doc accordingly) =20 Thank you very much, Guy ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB4518.877760FD--