mina-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno de Carvalho <kindern...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Message processing issue with MINA
Date Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:21:04 GMT
Chris,


Thanks for your attention and time.
It is in fact reasonable but if you increase the sleep time - say,
like 4ms - you will notice that the individual lifetime average goes
lower than that those 5ms.
What I'm trying to understand is why that individual lifetime is
greater than the global average. It may even be normal, I'm just
trying to get a proper and convincing explanation - these results will
go in a thesis, so you see why I need that explanation ;)

Still, those are pretty good results, I can't get any better than an
average of 40ms with a core 2 duo lappy @ 2Ghz, both windows and
linux.


Best regards,
  Bruno

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Christopher
Popp<christopherpopp@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>> Speaking in numbers, executing the test multiple times, I get a constant
>>> global average of ~1ms lifetime, but individual lifetime measurement
>>> averages ranges 40~80ms.
>
>
>
> I downloaded your code and gave it a run...it printed out the following with the defaults
(no sleep).
>
>        [SERVER] Binding Server to localhost/127.0.0.1:20002 TCP
>        [SERVER] Bound to localhost/127.0.0.1:20002
>        [SERVER] Session created: /127.0.0.1:2598
>        [CLIENT] Session created: localhost/127.0.0.1:20002
>        [CLIENT] Session opened: localhost/127.0.0.1:20002
>        [CLIENT] Connected to server, sending message.
>        [SERVER] Session opened: /127.0.0.1:2598
>        [SERVER] Test completed, took 63ms to receive 100 packets (63ms after sleep
discounts).
>        [SERVER] Calculated average lifetime was 00.63ms.
>        [SERVER] Individual average lifetime was 3.03ms.
>        [CLIENT] Session closed: localhost/127.0.0.1:20002
>        [SERVER] Session closed: /127.0.0.1:2598
>        [SERVER] Received a total of 5300b
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but it seems pretty reasonable to me.  I ran it under
Windows XP on a laptop with a dual core processor.
>
> Chris
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message