mina-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oscar <ro4...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: mina 1.x or 2.x ?
Date Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:29:46 GMT
Thank you very much for your quick reply.
Another question,  what's the plan of RC version?

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny
<elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Oscar,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Oscar <ro4tub@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi guys,
>>
>> Our product which used mina 2.0.0-M4 will release in 1 month.
>> Under the stress test, it performs good while transferring small packet (< 1k).
>> I don't know whether it is so stable.
>
> It is stable, from the API POV. There are some issues opened, but so
> far, you have to check to see if they impact your project.
>
> Regarding your stress test, the best would be to run it for more than
> one day, and see if your server delivers even when extremely loaded.
>
>>
>> My question is : shall we need use mina 1.7 instead of 2.0.0 M5?
>
> It's up to you. As this is OSS, you have no guarantee whatsoever about
> any version. But, wait, even if it were M$ software, you would not get
> *any* guarantee either :)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
>

Mime
View raw message