mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jonathan Valliere (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (DIRMINA-1095) Seems like the management f UDP sessions is really unneficient
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2018 00:08:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16634787#comment-16634787
] 

Jonathan Valliere edited comment on DIRMINA-1095 at 10/2/18 12:07 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[~elecharny]

Adding the boolean gate somehow causes this in the 2.1.0 branch.

[ERROR] Tests run: 5, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 38.055 s <<<
FAILURE! - in org.apache.mina.filter.executor.PriorityThreadPoolExecutorTest
[ERROR] testPrioritisation(org.apache.mina.filter.executor.PriorityThreadPoolExecutorTest)
 Time elapsed: 38.054 s  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: All other sessions should have finished later than the preferred
session (but at least one did not).
	at org.apache.mina.filter.executor.PriorityThreadPoolExecutorTest.testPrioritisation(PriorityThreadPoolExecutorTest.java:214)




was (Author: johnnyv):
[~elecharny]


> Seems like the management f UDP sessions is really unneficient
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRMINA-1095
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1095
>             Project: MINA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.19
>            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.20
>
>
> When we process incoming UDP messages, we iterate over the activated {{SelectionKey}}s.
That's ok, but for each one of them, we read the data and try to flush the scheduled messages.
The loop where it's done seems to iterate on *all* the managed sessions, for each keys we
are processing :
> {code:java}
>    private void processReadySessions(Set<SelectionKey> handles) {
>         Iterator<SelectionKey> iterator = handles.iterator();
>         while (iterator.hasNext()) {
>             SelectionKey key = iterator.next();
>             DatagramChannel handle = (DatagramChannel) key.channel();
>             iterator.remove();
>             try {
>                 if (key.isValid() && key.isReadable()) {
>                     readHandle(handle);
>                 }
>                 if (key.isValid() && key.isWritable()) {
>                     for (IoSession session : getManagedSessions().values()) {
>                         scheduleFlush((NioSession) session);
> ...
> {code}
> There is no reason to do so. First, we should not iterate on all the managed sessions
(we may have thousands), but only the sessions which have something to write, and we certainly
should not do that for every active key...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message