mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edouard De Oliveira <doe_wan...@yahoo.fr>
Subject Re : releasing 2.0.0-M3 quickly
Date Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:08:01 GMT
+1 
also working on DIRMINA-519 will try to commit something before tomorrow night 
if i can, otherwise it will be addressed in 2.0.0 M3 

 Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php



----- Message d'origine ----
De : Mark Webb <elihusmails@gmail.com>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lundi, 28 Juillet 2008, 23h28mn 49s
Objet : Re: releasing 2.0.0-M3 quickly

+1 Sounds fine with me.  I am still working on the composite buffer support,
but I do not think that it is critical to get into a release right away.



On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:15 PM, W.B. Garvelink
<barend.garvelink@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'd say stick to the 72 hours. Rushing a release is seldom a good idea
> in my experience.
>
> I haven't yet gotten around to finishing up on DIRMINA-608, but I see
> no problems pushing that to M4.
>
>
> Barend
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Julien Vermillard
> <jvermillard@archean.fr> wrote:
> > yep, and me to gather time and fix the distribution :)
> > Julien
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:47:04 -0400
> > "Alex Karasulu" <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 to releasing.  Do we really have to cut down the 72 hrs?  Might
> >> want to give some time for people to test it?
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
> >> <elecharny@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Julien Vermillard wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi guys,
> >> >>
> >> >> 2.0.0-M2 release is suffering some serious issues :
> >> >> - DIRMINA-609 a big perf regression on big message (quite common)
> >> >> - the tarballs are fubared, you miss half of the modules
> >> >>
> >> >> I tihkn we need to redo a release soon (M3), specially for
> >> >> DIRMINA-609
> >> >>
> >> >> WDYT ?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > +1.
> >> >
> >> > You can launch a quick vote, and if the PMC aggreed on, we can even
> >> > shorten the 72 hours wait to something like 24hours, as we are now
> >> > on monday. That make sense for such a big regression.
> >> >
> >> > Otherwise, I also think that the Write issue should be addressed
> >> > correctly in 2.0.0-M4 :
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-577
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-518
> >> >
> >> > (more to come)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks !
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > --
> >> > cordialement, regards,
> >> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> >> > www.iktek.com
> >> > directory.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>



      _____________________________________________________________________________ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message