mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sangjin Lee" <sjl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Date Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:42:14 GMT
Just fixed it.  Thanks for pointing that out.

Regards,
Sangjin

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:21 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <trustin@gmail.com>
wrote:

> One tiny issue: 1.0-SNAPSHOT should be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT according to our
> version numbering scheme:
>
> http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html#Downloads-VersionNumberingScheme
>
> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > The move is done...
> > Thanks,
> > Sangjin
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I began looking into this...  Just to summarize what's going to happen
> >> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currentlythe branches
directory is empty).
> >> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will
> be
> >> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
> >> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
> >> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
> >> - artifactId: asyncweb-client
> >> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> - name: AsyncHttpClient
> >>
> >> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sangjin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <trustin@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please go ahead and move it here.  :)
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Sangjin
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId.  Since there is
no
> >>> 1.0
> >>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great
and
> >>> is the
> >>>>> reason I chimed in.  I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice
> >>> home
> >>>>> here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Alan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <trustin@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>  Sounds like a good idea.  I'd prefer GAHC to use the same
> artifactId
> >>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth
> transition
> >>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :).  What do you
think
> >>> about
> >>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox?  I'm
fine
> >>> with
> >>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb
suite
> >>> (i.e.
> >>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation.  It's really G AHC in it's
new home.
> >>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that,
when
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff
that's
> >>>>>>> built
> >>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  Why not have the same artifactId and just have different
version?
> >>>  Or
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>  Yep, that's it.
> >>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we
release it
> under
> >>>>>>>>> 1.0 of
> >>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than
the
> artifactId
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> the new
> >>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on.  This would
be 2.0 and
> >>>>>>>>> written
> >>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it's this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of
the thread...  We
> >>>>>>>>>> discussed
> >>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Sangjin
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
<
> >>>>>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin
Lee) <
> >>>>>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we?  Could you tell me the message
ID so I can
> >>>>>>>>>>> re-read the
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>  related thread?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier
was that this would
> >>>>>>>>>>>> be our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina
project, IIRC.  I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> still
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승
(Trustin Lee)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <trustin@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first
and then find out the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> best way
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>  merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb).
 WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client
in the Geronimo sandbox
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think
now would be a good time to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees.
 Where would be the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software
Engineer, JBoss, Red
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is
actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer,
JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually
human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>> --
> >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>> --
> >>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message