mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Trustin Lee" <trus...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: result poll logging frameworks
Date Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:31:10 GMT
On 10/8/07, Maarten Bosteels <mbosteels.dns@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> Thanks for participating in the poll. Here are the results:
>
> log4j:  14
> logback: 4
> slf4j-simple:  3
> slf4j-nop:  2
> java.util.logging: 1
>
> 8 people are using exclusively log4j
> 3 people are using exclusively logback
> 1 person is using exclusively java.util.logging
>
> Everybody using slf4j-simple or slf4j-nop is also using log4j.
> I suppose these people use log4j in production, and slf4j-simple or slf4j-nop
> during development, right ?
>
> That would mean that there is only one poor soul (sorry Steven E. Harris :-) )
> that can't use the MDC feature.
>
> Trustin, maybe we should reopen the discussion about removing IoSessionLogger
> in favour of MdcInjectionFilter :-)

Well, there's at least one person who's using java.util.logging in the
mailing list, and there should be more people who's not in here.  If
we are going to drop good support for JUL, what is the use of SLF4J?

Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6

Mime
View raw message