mina-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Maarten Bosteels" <mbosteels....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Meta Transport: an idea on implementing reconnection and proxy
Date Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:53:42 GMT
I agree with everybody else that the decorator pattern is an elegant solution.
About system properties, I agree with Trustin: I don't think we should
support that.

Maarten

On 10/2/07, Trustin Lee <trustin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Niklas Therning <niklas@trillian.se> wrote:
> > Yes, I think this is the way to go about implementing this kinds of
> > things. This is similar to what was suggested the last time the proxy
> > issue came up on the mailing list
> > (http://www.nabble.com/Proxy-filter-tf3880454.html).
>
> How did you find that thread? :)
>
> > Now, one thing we should consider is whether we want to support
> > specifying proxyHost, proxyPort via system properties, just like Socket
> > does. In that case I don't think it will be as simple as wrapping like
> > suggested above. Maybe we could support this by having some kind of
> > factory which looks at the system properties?
>
> I agree with you that things will get complicated with system
> properties.  The questions is, do we really need to support system
> properties?  If a user uses a factory like Spring, he or she could
> configure proxied connection very easily.
>
> Trustin
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
> --
> PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
>

Mime
View raw message