Mailing-List: contact dev-help@mina.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@mina.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of trustin@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.183 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=omha8wmF4ku9k921T6BFNEVOqM2MmfP0ndeEevdpSaEQfo3CmilPnFyJzyNzHc56/6H0mhsiPFdjXSWC010nC5TzkG2wHburhuI3+jqe8rox5AVqt92UiysYuQZMnkcxyTQBLksrXoqwbiy28aPDfWOPJyOXYcIGuT/f1WmyXg0=
Message-ID: <768dcb2e0612091912w7cd02bcgd39ab4a3286b63cd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:12:56 +0900
From: "Trustin Lee" <trustin@gmail.com>
To: dev@mina.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multicasting
In-Reply-To: 
 <120820061903.3423.4579B71700040A3A00000D5F2200734830020E020A0A05D29BD2040A0E080C0703@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_83375_17880994.1165720376786"
References: 
 <120820061903.3423.4579B71700040A3A00000D5F2200734830020E020A0A05D29BD2040A0E080C0703@comcast.net>

------=_Part_83375_17880994.1165720376786
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 12/9/06, michael.t.keenan@comcast.net <michael.t.keenan@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
> I'm new to Mina. I'm working on an application that will need Multicasting
> support.
> It looks like there is some interest in implementing it last year in
> DIRMINA-23.
> Is there still interest?  It appears no work as been done since it isn't
> assigned.
>

Multicast is not supported in JDK 1.5, so we didn't include it in MINA.

Yes, we are still interested because NIO doesn't perform better than
blocking-I/O when the number of connection is relatively small.  But its
priority for us has been very low because we can live just OK with NIO.  If
you are interested, you can always start to work on it and let us know.

BTW you shouldn't reply to a unrelated message to start a new thread because
some e-mail clients will not recognize it as a new thread but a reply to an
existing thread, which annoys users.

HTH,
Trustin
-- 
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41  4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4  455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6

------=_Part_83375_17880994.1165720376786--