Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4895D200BF7 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:37:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 473B8160B3E; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 849BD160B2F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:37:53 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 42931 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2017 16:37:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@metamodel.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@metamodel.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@metamodel.apache.org Received: (qmail 42920 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2017 16:37:52 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:37:52 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 4D4FBDFA22; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:37:52 +0000 (UTC) From: rposkocil To: dev@metamodel.apache.org Reply-To: dev@metamodel.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] metamodel issue #139: Support for NOT / NOT IN operator Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20170109163752.4D4FBDFA22@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 16:37:52 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:37:54 -0000 Github user rposkocil commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/139 I was thinking about it and for a complete option to be able to express all, what propositional logic allows, it should be enough so that we will add NOT IN and NOT LIKE operators. All operators should have a positive and negative form then every conditions can be transfomed to allowed constructions. The next point is that I have forgoten on the fluent api for queries where the operators have to impletented, too. Do you agree with this solution? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---