metamodel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MetaModel 4.1 release?
Date Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:58:58 GMT
We could go with 4.1.0.

My 2-cents is that we could reserve something like 4.0.x for emergency
patches like security.


- Henry

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Kasper Sørensen
<i.am.kasper.sorensen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I feel like we should start planning MetaModel 4.1. In the current master
> branch we have a number of nice improvements that I'm really excited about
> and would like to see released. The main points from changes.txt:
>
> [METAMODEL-11] - New module "MetaModel-spring" which adds a convenient
> FactoryBean to produce various types of DataContext objects based on
> externalizable parameters, for Spring framework users.
> [METAMODEL-41] - Added a parser for SimpleTableDef objects
> (SimpleTableDefParser). It parses statements similar to CREATE TABLE
> statements, although without the "CREATE TABLE" prefix. For example: foo
> (bar INTEGER, baz VARCHAR)
> [METAMODEL-32] - Fixed thread-safety issue in Excel module when tables
> (sheets) metadata is updated.
> [METAMODEL-35] - Improved query rewriting for DB2 when paged queries
> contain ORDER BY clause.
> [METAMODEL-39] - Added pooling of active/used Connections and
> PreparedStatements in JDBC compiled queries.
>
> I think also the HBase module (in a branch) is looking rather OK for a
> first release. Maybe we can aim to finish up this module and include it. In
> that case I am all for releasing MetaModel again with a version number like
> 4.1.
>
> Of course we could also go for just a minor release bump like 4.0.1, but I
> think actually the addition of Spring module and potentially also HBase
> module is great news.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> - Kasper

Mime
View raw message