metamodel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ankit Kumar <ak.ankitku...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Discuss detailed steps needed for MetaModel release
Date Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:09:36 GMT
Yes Henry i also added the public key to some known public servers.
We also saw some keys file in svn. Can you point where i must add my public
key.

Regards
Ankit
On Oct 16, 2013 5:04 AM, "Henry Saputra" <henry.saputra@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ankit, have you generated the gpg key for ASF signing?
>
> On Friday, October 11, 2013, Kasper Sørensen wrote:
>
> > Great stuff :-)
> >
> > @Ankit, do you feel prepped to attempt a release then?
> >
> >
> > 2013/10/10 Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> >
> > > We just got our name approved by ASF legal:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-35
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Kasper Sørensen
> > > <i.am.kasper.sorensen@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > > I see that this JIRA issue has some progress made ... Now apparently
> > > > there's a SVN distribution directory. With this, can we go ahead and
> > > > attempt a release? Or what other steps do we need?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/10/1 Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > > >
> > > >> Just filed
> > > >>
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6815
> > > >>
> > > >> for our svnpubsusb dist target
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> - Henry
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Ankit Kumar <
> ak.ankitkumar@gmail.com<javascript:;>
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > Hi All,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > In this thread we would like to discuss detailed steps still
> needed
> > to
> > > >> > perform the first MetaModel release.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Stuff done so far : -
> > > >> > 1. Set the right versions 4.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT in poms.
> > > >> > 2. Prepared the signing key.
> > > >> > 3. Fixed the Apache RAT failures.
> > > >> > 4. JIRA ticket for Nexus access created.
> > > >> > 5. Compared the pom with Apache Blur. - Differences found mainly
> in
> > > >> > distributionManagement and repositories section.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We still need the following: -
> > > >> > 1. Verify that the distributionManagement node in pom.xml is
> > pointing
> > > to
> > > >> > the right repository/snapshot repository.
> > > >> > 2. Correct access is available to the release engineer performing
> > > >> release.
> > > >> > 3. Infra ticket to set svn pubsub for publishing release
> artifacts.
> > > >> > 4. More.....
> > > >> >
> > > >> > @All, please add to the list.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ~Ankit
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message