metamodel-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Franklin <m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Review Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review (CTR) (Prev: Minor improvements to fluent Query builder API)
Date Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:43:13 GMT
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.saputra@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi MetaModel community,
>
> Per email from Matt, I'd like to formally start discussion about Review
> Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review (CTR).
>
> I actually like to use review then commit (RTC) for big changes tat
> requires changes to major code flow and behavior.
> For small bug fixes we probably dont need code review or use common sense
> when needed.
>

In general, I agree.  The only thing I would change is that it depends on
where we are at in the development cycle.  If we are nearing release, RTC
makes a ton of sense for any large change, but early in development it can
be a big barrier to moving quickly.

Thoughts?


>
> All comments and suggestions are welcomed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Henry
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Matt Franklin <m.ben.franklin@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > This also brings up the question as to what type of community MetaModel
> > is/wants to be.  Are we Review Then Commit (RTC) or Commit Then Review
> > (CTR)?  There are positives and negatives to both approaches, but most
> > communities I have seen are CTR.
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message