Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mesos-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C612918F1B for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15905 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2016 07:37:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-user-archive@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 15842 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2016 07:37:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 15832 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2016 07:37:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C67B0C0257 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXJA32ZPFroJ for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f46.google.com (mail-lf0-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8599C5F249 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c126so111521773lfb.2 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:37:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=NRoT++phwAsnlDespfai0bXYk4WWBfdTWmdIaAJX0eI=; b=TC8RSbC1SM8Xq8yVjqSVjr1iXH83rCQSw9VmYTTvjqTg4US21wx1emZpSoHTw/dVeS gs1CtYOMjHz4KHF6woi91CAdIn8sDP5Q9j48t0vP9glzh/nSSOYSeViNwdhjTt1CSLTL gz7OjcuFcXA5W90aO9AUMxfBi3xCiQ1dkpSx6Qvn/enTda6okKNtlPszb6M3TZpavLRe DYyyiSF08/j+yKQ27ahczylQPD4sFmJUh9NypbSUqyz+g0fNLMZ6K4RCzlSC7hKsdz+B Gn+pfhF6nrFnLOxeR6x+Uj64R/wZsth7wfZ6dqT/SnHqukTghjqE0+TJP3rUlDw64FIt acZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=NRoT++phwAsnlDespfai0bXYk4WWBfdTWmdIaAJX0eI=; b=mSvqoU4nPAiWKUQ5hKZfJC7hlu2zIlCXB0SBXaL4IAt+NNRJ1W+Kq4RyDKAHGqYKVR gPUfQz0AtG6dzAnyHMLFQ9CFS5uocHKlGDTacwdGgze0aScJKodG4/TLLjWPeF9wYnFb 2iiKVV3TEEaSy5Zg7KRnJAiFqUMguz0jiM6bzK0RxZ7uITmA75TkkyyXADDyA7b048NH Remxb2PqzYhB3W1WsV87ACoeQ6dCLiqcWBFk0RGajWxCIotJud7N8IIOLdga50Q6QRbo xH1Kh/zXWxxy1M7QZQq09uEs9rMiaKtSwVR/xY1lSf7sFtg6nFS//ce79Pq6eShMkJET m9sQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU3YWumcGRj29aTVAmvG6h6uSex4Qg1rdP68zsWqnRTe0u/amN5MgaApuLSueEVoIjxq/goY7GQ6TJnXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.151.72 with SMTP id z69mr13830721lfd.0.1461569844839; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.181.132 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 00:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: mesos docker vs native container From: vincent gromakowski To: user@mesos.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114016c26a8a9c05314a3f7d --001a114016c26a8a9c05314a3f7d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I am very interesting in getting some feedback of people who has moved from native container through Docker specially from network performance perspective. DCOS has been open sourced and I like all automation it brings with frameworks but it seems everything is running in docker ? I am looking for the smack stack for which network perf is important. Tx --001a114016c26a8a9c05314a3f7d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am very interesting in getting some feedback of peo= ple who has moved from native container through Docker specially from netwo= rk performance perspective.
DCOS has been open sourced and I like= all automation it brings with frameworks but it seems everything is runnin= g in docker ?
I am looking for the smack stack for which network = perf is important.
Tx
--001a114016c26a8a9c05314a3f7d--