mesos-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Domin <st...@gocardless.com>
Subject Re: Help us review #MesosCon 2015 proposals
Date Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:41:51 GMT
All of them look great indeed. Didn't reject any as well.

I find the wording a bit annoying as I didn't really find any talk
"average", I just selected "accept" for the one I really want to hear about
more than anything else.

On Saturday, February 21, 2015, Pablo Delgado <pablete@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe a scale of 1 to 5 makes more sense.
>
> I did "Accept" on ALL talks but 3 that consider "Average" but only on the
> basis of repeated subject. Did not reject Anything.
>
> I wonder how the selection is going to be made, since all of them are
> great talks!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Jie Yu <yujie.jay@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yujie.jay@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> It does not allow me to continue to see the second page if I don't make
>> choices on the first one.
>>
>> - Jie
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Benjamin Mahler <
>> benjamin.mahler@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','benjamin.mahler@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Great to see so many proposals!
>>>
>>> Is it intentional that we have to review them in small subsets? It's
>>> hard to tell what to consider as an "Average" proposal when you can only
>>> see a small subset at a time. Just curious on the reasoning behind that.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Dave Lester <dave@davelester.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dave@davelester.org');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> A total of 63 proposals were submitted for #MesosCon[1], up
>>>> significantly from 24 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
>>>> last year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up
>>>> for community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what
>>>> should be included in the program.
>>>>
>>>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>>>> segmented them based upon three loose themes: Frameworks, Users / Ops,
>>>> and Mesos Internals and Extensions. We encourage you to review proposals
>>>> based upon one theme, or all three!
>>>>
>>>> *Frameworks (18 Proposals):* bit.ly/MesosCon2015Frameworks Talks on how
>>>> frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>>>
>>>> *Users / Ops (28 Proposals):* bit.ly/MesosCon2015UsersOps A combination
>>>> of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>>>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>>>
>>>> *Mesos Internals and Extensions (17 Proposals):*
>>>> bit.ly/MesosCon2015InternalsExt Features of the Mesos core, or software
>>>> integrations with the internals of Mesos. Some proposals have overlap
>>>> with frameworks and ops, but most are focused on the foundational
>>>> aspects of how Mesos works.
>>>>
>>>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions
>>>> you didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for your participation! The forms will close on March
>>>> 4th 2015, two weeks from today.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Links:
>>>>
>>>>   1. http://mesoscon.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message