mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jiang Yan Xu <xuj...@apple.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 55453: Updated comments in `HealthCheck` protobuf for clarity.
Date Tue, 31 Jan 2017 02:01:16 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55453/#review163612
-----------------------------------------------------------




include/mesos/mesos.proto (lines 424 - 426)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/55453/#comment235079>

    The most direct interpretation for the delay is actually the time since the task was launched
right? AFAIK Mesos provided executors immediately send TASK_RUNNING but this is not generally
required right?


- Jiang Yan Xu


On Jan. 20, 2017, 6:48 a.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55453/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2017, 6:48 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman, haosdent huang, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 8f14444d6957a97eff1e0a94817d38e7a7de6d69 
>   include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 74e7851b147ab821dceeab6e838d34b092f101c3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55453/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> None: not a functional change.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message