mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gastón Kleiman <gas...@mesosphere.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 52864: Removed unnecessary sleep in HealthChecker.
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:46:38 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52864/#review152669
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Gastón Kleiman


On Oct. 14, 2016, 12:35 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52864/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 14, 2016, 12:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and haosdent huang.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> After we have refactored the HealthChecker into a library from the
> binary, there is no more need to wait before failing the promise to
> ensure the message has been sent to the executor. HealthChecker
> lifetime is managed by an executor, hence it is their responsibility
> not to clean the instance until after the message with the `kill_task`
> flag is received.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/health-check/health_checker.cpp 96ae1a733ff3d211b84d0893b4603873af1c89f0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52864/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/52873/.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message