mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mesos ReviewBot <revi...@mesos.apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 51027: Track allocation candidates to bound allocator.
Date Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:22:26 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/51027/#review146673
-----------------------------------------------------------



Patch looks great!

Reviews applied: [51028, 51027]

Passed command: export OS='ubuntu:14.04' BUILDTOOL='autotools' COMPILER='gcc' CONFIGURATION='--verbose'
ENVIRONMENT='GLOG_v=1 MESOS_VERBOSE=1'; ./support/docker_build.sh

- Mesos ReviewBot


On Aug. 23, 2016, 8:49 a.m., Jacob Janco wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/51027/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 23, 2016, 8:49 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Mahler, Guangya Liu, James Peach, Klaus Ma, and Jiang
Yan Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-3157
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3157
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - Triggered allocations dispatch allocate() only
>   if there is no pending allocation in the queue.
> - Allocation candidates are accumulated and only
>   cleared when enqueued allocations are processed.
> - Batched allocations are handled synchronously.
> 
> - Carrying over work from https://reviews.apache.org/r/41658/ and added the previous
reviewers
> - Specifically, this patch introduces the boolean flag pendingAllocation, which when
set on event 
>   triggered allocations, will prevent additional no-op allocations: the flag is cleared
when 
>   the enqueued allocation is processed, subsequent event triggered allocations will update
a set
>   of allocation candidates rather than dispatching an additional allocate().
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.hpp bdbc6d3b5b959990538f4e3b7b1a3b031d9aea05

>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp 234ef98529964a0b6d3f132426a6c8ccbb1263ee

> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/51027/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> note: check without filters depends on https://reviews.apache.org/r/51028
> 
> With new benchmark https://reviews.apache.org/r/49617: 
> Sample output without 51027:
> [ RUN      ] SlaveAndFrameworkCount/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test.FrameworkFailover/22
> Using 10000 agents and 3000 frameworks
> Added 3000 frameworks in 57251us
> Added 10000 agents in 3.21345353333333mins
> allocator settled after  1.61236038333333mins
> [       OK ] SlaveAndFrameworkCount/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test.FrameworkFailover/22
(290578 ms)
> 
> Sample output with 51027:
> [ RUN      ] SlaveAndFrameworkCount/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test.FrameworkFailover/22
> Using 10000 agents and 3000 frameworks
> Added 3000 frameworks in 39817us
> Added 10000 agents in 3.22860541666667mins
> allocator settled after  25.525654secs
> [       OK ] SlaveAndFrameworkCount/HierarchicalAllocator_BENCHMARK_Test.FrameworkFailover/22
(220137 ms)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob Janco
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message