mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guangya Liu <gyliu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 43801: Refactored and simplified the docker puller interfaces.
Date Tue, 23 Feb 2016 07:26:48 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43801/#review120271
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/paths.hpp (line 32)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43801/#comment181704>

    Why removing this? I think that this still exist as a temp directory when pulling docker
image?



src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/paths.hpp (lines 34 - 36)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/43801/#comment181705>

    Do we need to add layer.tar here?


- Guangya Liu


On 二月 20, 2016, 6:09 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43801/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 二月 20, 2016, 6:09 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song and Timothy Chen.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4499
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4499
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is the first step of cleaning up the docker registry puller/client code base. I
did the following simplications:
> 
> 1) Simplify the paths functions. The getImageArchiveXXX functions are redundant.
> 2) Simplify the Puller::pull interface. We just need to return layer ids and no need
to return path.
> 3) Used untar from command utils, and kill the same function in puller.cpp.
> 4) A lot of consistency fixes, including using the same type and name.
> 5) A lot of style fixes.
> 
> The next step will be to cleanup and refactor registry_puller to use uri Fetcher (docker
plugin) to download manifest and blobs (and kill registry client).
> 
> Reviewers are recommended to look at the end version, instead of the diff.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/local_puller.hpp 811c24b43f7aec9db406dd521770c6cd82097c92

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/local_puller.cpp f3e7c042f2c9980f6274c8185ee8bb89a8b02002

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/paths.hpp d2b0cf95e5ed7664071484a27a2a1f9bafff70d6

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/paths.cpp 82d92a2a9cce181eb283395a32e93cbb1586703b

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/puller.hpp 5b2d72c22fcbcc379b4901607cf3eb682de66206

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/puller.cpp a239b97557ad20353c67050dbc89ef16da898330

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.hpp bccbac11113357cf942446604e6cf5d16c3d594b

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/registry_puller.cpp 3fcf1471a035e35a2cac22442655ad65a84a9793

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/store.hpp 880e216e33dd178d0baa47d3958c84cda4d9e25e

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/provisioner/docker/store.cpp 2f1d3e002140f34c646aab445a419c9c3d712f99

>   src/tests/containerizer/provisioner_docker_tests.cpp 4db6793a21abbb7ea4de0d0fca0431237d38d013

> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43801/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message