mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joris Van Remoortere <joris.van.remoort...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 43583: Added documentation for multiple-disk support.
Date Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:58:05 GMT


> On Feb. 15, 2016, 8:39 p.m., Neil Conway wrote:
> > docs/multiple-disk.md, line 12
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/diff/1/?file=1241734#file1241734line12>
> >
> >     "three forms"
> >     
> >     Is there a reason to say "currently"? I'd be inclined to remove it as redundant.

The reason I used currently is because we will likely introduce a 4th: block devices. Is there
a better way to express this? Maybe it's not important to clarify that just yet?


- Joris


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/#review119238
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 15, 2016, 7:42 p.m., Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 15, 2016, 7:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Neil Conway.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-4531
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4531
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/multiple-disk.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43583/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joris Van Remoortere
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message