mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexander Rukletsov" <ruklet...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request 42221: Removed references to wDRF from allocator.
Date Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:25:10 GMT


> On Jan. 13, 2016, 1:52 a.m., Guangya Liu wrote:
> > Since the comments are mainly to developers, the `second stage` is not very clear
to developers, but the `WDRF` seems more clear. If want to update, what about "fair share
stage"?

The fairness of the "second" stage is determined by sorters as well. For example, one may
write a sorter that favors roles starting with "alex-" : ). What allocator knows is that there
are two stages: the first where only quota'ed frameworks are processed and the second for
all frameworks.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42221/#review114126
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 12, 2016, 11:06 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42221/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 12, 2016, 11:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler and Joris Van Remoortere.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Since wDRF is encapsulated in the choice of sorter, it should not be
> mentioned in the allocator code.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/master/allocator/mesos/hierarchical.cpp df8bccaf2b8cfc0cb5ca18d4867371ae7a84c12f

> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42221/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `make check` on Mac OS 10.10.4
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message