mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Park" <mp...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 41001: Improved 'ReservationTest.ACLMultipleOperations'.
Date Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:49:22 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41001/#review109732
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Michael Park


On Dec. 10, 2015, 2:02 a.m., Greg Mann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41001/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 10, 2015, 2:02 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Jie Yu and Michael Park.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Improved 'ReservationTest.ACLMultipleOperations'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/reservation_tests.cpp 3405b47c367e3c20e2a9139ab95dd8fd1805ea8d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41001/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> `GTEST_FILTER="ReservationTest.ACLMultipleOperations" bin/mesos-tests.sh --gtest_repeat=1000
--gtest_break_on_failure`
> 
> This test was originally written to test the interaction of multiple RESERVE/UNRESERVE/LAUNCH
operations in a single `acceptOffers()` call when authorization is enabled. In order to probe
the effect of authorization on this interaction, some operations should fail due to failed
authorization. However, this test included operations that failed simply because they were
malformed. I altered the test so that now operations will fail due to failed authorization,
which tests the desired functionality more precisely.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Greg Mann
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message