Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-mesos-reviews-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-reviews-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AE17183CE for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88055 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2015 18:28:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-mesos-reviews-archive@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 88030 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2015 18:28:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact reviews-help@mesos.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: reviews@mesos.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list reviews@mesos.apache.org Received: (qmail 88009 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2015 18:28:53 -0000 Received: from reviews-vm.apache.org (HELO reviews.apache.org) (140.211.11.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:28:53 +0000 Received: from reviews.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reviews.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488052A3D14; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4738277802328389319==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Review Request 39384: Added docs for how developers should split their work into Git commits. From: "Ben Mahler" To: "Ben Mahler" Cc: "Neil Conway" , "mesos" Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:28:50 -0000 Message-ID: <20151016182850.1509.52117@reviews.apache.org> X-ReviewBoard-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Sender: "Ben Mahler" X-ReviewGroup: mesos X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, OOF, AutoReply X-ReviewRequest-URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39384/ X-Sender: "Ben Mahler" References: <20151016182103.1509.41432@reviews.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20151016182103.1509.41432@reviews.apache.org> Reply-To: "Ben Mahler" X-ReviewRequest-Repository: mesos --===============4738277802328389319== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > On Oct. 16, 2015, 6:21 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > Thanks Neil! It looks like we have overlap between this and the effective code review doc here: > > http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/effective-code-reviewing/ > > > > Should we just link to this from the submitting a patch doc? Anything you think should be added / changed in the code review doc? > > Neil Conway wrote: > Ah, I hadn't seen that -- I think overlap isn't the end of the world, and a lot of new contributors won't read the code-reviewing page. How about both adding some text to submitting-a-patch and also including a link to the code-reviewing page? Sounds good. - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39384/#review102955 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 16, 2015, 4:41 a.m., Neil Conway wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/39384/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 16, 2015, 4:41 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler. > > > Repository: mesos > > > Description > ------- > > Added docs for how developers should split their work into Git commits. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/submitting-a-patch.md cbd99fe3fd162703165933336700e3fc292243a9 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39384/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Neil Conway > > --===============4738277802328389319==--