mesos-reviews mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Timothy Chen" <tnac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review Request 38746: Added TaskStatus::Reason to containerizer Termination message.
Date Fri, 09 Oct 2015 04:52:30 GMT

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38746/#review102006
-----------------------------------------------------------



include/mesos/mesos.proto (line 1119)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38746/#comment159530>

    What's the reasoning behind this order?



src/slave/slave.cpp (line 4509)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/38746/#comment159531>

    Should we say Executor preempted here?
    
    And also I wonder if we should stick with the Qos correction terminology here, e.g: Container
preempted by QoS correction?


- Timothy Chen


On Oct. 9, 2015, 1:28 a.m., Jie Yu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38746/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 9, 2015, 1:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Timothy Chen, and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2035
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2035
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added TaskStatus::Reason to containerizer Termination message.
> 
> The following doc summarized the problem and proposed a solution:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1klGDAu5yBVf-CGWLqvELLIfxLfRaisGkhi6Gn7952-4/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   include/mesos/containerizer/containerizer.proto f16ccc89f83da28c413ccfa0687a06b7515a605c

>   include/mesos/mesos.proto 4a16be1f570769f3ce42a50a9da9f4fb1c227999 
>   include/mesos/slave/isolator.proto 9d38a25470a79af1eda9122c037c82b8cbbad6ed 
>   src/common/protobuf_utils.hpp 8793851fb927ab1326da6b6a424b3c6a75eb5001 
>   src/common/protobuf_utils.cpp c1e8e011e6d0b8e1cd8a836e3168685ec401b21b 
>   src/slave/containerizer/docker.cpp 6c975f904178e01797b67628a2d471ec7b3b1fbf 
>   src/slave/containerizer/external_containerizer.cpp 211649201777f0d2ce802a865090129eacdd53be

>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/cgroups/mem.cpp 89c86beb9227eb8a6e70a413e7b3934add652981

>   src/slave/containerizer/isolators/posix/disk.cpp c324c79f8d598095d07fbcb26e806a0978c2a520

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.hpp 4c1419290645ad4c44360a81618a6cea7ad190df

>   src/slave/containerizer/mesos/containerizer.cpp b904b2d88e9b62fa4ba312c4569a4d89b0dc6052

>   src/slave/slave.hpp 18be4f8188ad34ef4d0aa4b5eba241053d071476 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp d1c9977feeb30ad43586a4560eed155865d27a6c 
>   src/tests/containerizer.cpp 1f743155526192569dd61a47ab67d8e58aab205a 
>   src/tests/containerizer/docker_containerizer_tests.cpp 8771ef661039310d79845513ea4602e15b2ad13d

>   src/tests/containerizer/mesos_containerizer_tests.cpp 5bc7d408bda0c249e1b66747d8bd87e688362e6c

>   src/tests/slave_recovery_tests.cpp fd285fbba0ec08fe2afbdd8da0b0b451126da0eb 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp dccdbb0ec5352df5da63d5ef7261bfc7fd599acb 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38746/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> tested with Docker as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jie Yu
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message